I find it interesting that there's loads of people who made a core part of their identity campaigning against trans women being in women's spaces and how it impacts women, who have gone completely silent about Grok being used to undress and brutalise w...
-
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
Some Grok users, mostly men, began to demand to see bruising on the bodies of the women, and for blood to be added to the images. Requests to show women tied up and gagged were instantly granted.
‘Add blood, forced smile’
-
Some Grok users, mostly men, began to demand to see bruising on the bodies of the women, and for blood to be added to the images. Requests to show women tied up and gagged were instantly granted.
‘Add blood, forced smile’
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
-
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
@GossiTheDog I did that with cheap loans from GE, the media department brushed me off but the executives whose names were going to feature certainly didn't.
-
Some Grok users, mostly men, began to demand to see bruising on the bodies of the women, and for blood to be added to the images. Requests to show women tied up and gagged were instantly granted.
‘Add blood, forced smile’
@GossiTheDog
I'm not sure what to say.
Brazil very clearly showed what to do. It worked.
Starmer just needs to do it. -
Some Grok users, mostly men, began to demand to see bruising on the bodies of the women, and for blood to be added to the images. Requests to show women tied up and gagged were instantly granted.
‘Add blood, forced smile’
THe more this keeps going on, the more i'm speechless. Makes me grow a desire for Twitter to disappear completely.
Let it stop.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
-
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
@GossiTheDog I am kind of bummed that me leaving doesn't coincide with any (meaningful) all-hands. In the last couple of years they've got bored of actually answering hairy questions though...
-
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
Before we get to the staff members at cyber companies, the Financial Times has the staff at X and xAI. https://www.ft.com/content/ad94db4c-95a0-4c65-bd8d-3b43e1251091
-
Before we get to the staff members at cyber companies, the Financial Times has the staff at X and xAI. https://www.ft.com/content/ad94db4c-95a0-4c65-bd8d-3b43e1251091
@GossiTheDog I suppose a big top is a big tent.
-
Before we get to the staff members at cyber companies, the Financial Times has the staff at X and xAI. https://www.ft.com/content/ad94db4c-95a0-4c65-bd8d-3b43e1251091
@GossiTheDog One feature shit enough to change the whole site completely...
-
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
-
The UK PM has asked communication regulator for options around banning Twitter from operating in the UK, due to their refusal to deal with unconsensual undressing of women and girls. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/08/musks-x-could-be-banned-in-britain-over-ai-chatbot-row/
How about a warrant for Musk's arrest as a CSAM pornographer.
-
@GossiTheDog So X is now a commercial CSAM provider?
X should be driven to the dark web where they belong. Try building a successful "everything app" only accessible via tor.
-
The UK PM has asked communication regulator for options around banning Twitter from operating in the UK, due to their refusal to deal with unconsensual undressing of women and girls. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/08/musks-x-could-be-banned-in-britain-over-ai-chatbot-row/
@GossiTheDog
"AI chatbox row" isn't specific to the issue. This is about the creation and distribution of CSAM and revenge porn, both of which are illegal. -
@futurebird @GossiTheDog Limiting Grok to paid users (here in the UK) probably won't save Grok in the UK, though. Possession of CSAM is a strict liability offense, as is distributing it. Doesn't matter whether it's a paid account or free, it's child pornography (usually a max 3 year prison sentence, but if aggravated can pull 10 years). Generating it is ALSO a criminal offense.
-
@davey_cakes Elon threatened to replace the PM and overthrow the UK government, he’s monitored by GCHQ as a result as a threat to national security. I think the latest stunt may be the final straw.
@GossiTheDog @davey_cakes and he encouraged racist violence in the UK as well, didn’t he?
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog Next step would be to investigate those paid subscribers for making and sharing child porn.
-
If you're wondering on xAI's stance on this, aside from Elon posting a crying with laughing emoji, Grok's creators have raised a further $20bn from Cisco and such yesterday.
https://www.reuters.com/business/musks-xai-raises-20-billion-upsized-series-e-funding-round-2026-01-06/@GossiTheDog Maybe the investors (millionaires and billionaires) in X and Grok who plan on making profit ― off CSAM ― should also be sent to prison for 25 years (min, no parol, same prison as Epstein) for knowingly funding it ― even if it's the entire board and CEOs of Vanguard, Blackrock, Musk, Trump, Microsoft, etc... whomever has invested stakes in it. There is no-way they don't know about this, right now. The world knows!
-
X should be driven to the dark web where they belong. Try building a successful "everything app" only accessible via tor.
@jonhendry @jewiddern @GossiTheDog I find it telling and DEEPLY disturbing that if you ask text to image LLMs to depict someone in their early to mid 20s you will almost always get back a depiction of a young child (like single digits). I’ve found you have to explicitly call for mid 30s to reliably get back an image that isn’t a child.
It’s so fucked up.
-
@futurebird @GossiTheDog Limiting Grok to paid users (here in the UK) probably won't save Grok in the UK, though. Possession of CSAM is a strict liability offense, as is distributing it. Doesn't matter whether it's a paid account or free, it's child pornography (usually a max 3 year prison sentence, but if aggravated can pull 10 years). Generating it is ALSO a criminal offense.
@cstross @futurebird @GossiTheDog how is the llc giving these people a fig leaf for overt criminal, morally reprehensible, actions?
