I find it interesting that there's loads of people who made a core part of their identity campaigning against trans women being in women's spaces and how it impacts women, who have gone completely silent about Grok being used to undress and brutalise w...
-
The UK PM has asked communication regulator for options around banning Twitter from operating in the UK, due to their refusal to deal with unconsensual undressing of women and girls. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/08/musks-x-could-be-banned-in-britain-over-ai-chatbot-row/
@GossiTheDog
"AI chatbox row" isn't specific to the issue. This is about the creation and distribution of CSAM and revenge porn, both of which are illegal. -
@futurebird @GossiTheDog Limiting Grok to paid users (here in the UK) probably won't save Grok in the UK, though. Possession of CSAM is a strict liability offense, as is distributing it. Doesn't matter whether it's a paid account or free, it's child pornography (usually a max 3 year prison sentence, but if aggravated can pull 10 years). Generating it is ALSO a criminal offense.
-
@davey_cakes Elon threatened to replace the PM and overthrow the UK government, he’s monitored by GCHQ as a result as a threat to national security. I think the latest stunt may be the final straw.
@GossiTheDog @davey_cakes and he encouraged racist violence in the UK as well, didn’t he?
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog Next step would be to investigate those paid subscribers for making and sharing child porn.
-
If you're wondering on xAI's stance on this, aside from Elon posting a crying with laughing emoji, Grok's creators have raised a further $20bn from Cisco and such yesterday.
https://www.reuters.com/business/musks-xai-raises-20-billion-upsized-series-e-funding-round-2026-01-06/@GossiTheDog Maybe the investors (millionaires and billionaires) in X and Grok who plan on making profit ― off CSAM ― should also be sent to prison for 25 years (min, no parol, same prison as Epstein) for knowingly funding it ― even if it's the entire board and CEOs of Vanguard, Blackrock, Musk, Trump, Microsoft, etc... whomever has invested stakes in it. There is no-way they don't know about this, right now. The world knows!
-
X should be driven to the dark web where they belong. Try building a successful "everything app" only accessible via tor.
@jonhendry @jewiddern @GossiTheDog I find it telling and DEEPLY disturbing that if you ask text to image LLMs to depict someone in their early to mid 20s you will almost always get back a depiction of a young child (like single digits). I’ve found you have to explicitly call for mid 30s to reliably get back an image that isn’t a child.
It’s so fucked up.
-
@futurebird @GossiTheDog Limiting Grok to paid users (here in the UK) probably won't save Grok in the UK, though. Possession of CSAM is a strict liability offense, as is distributing it. Doesn't matter whether it's a paid account or free, it's child pornography (usually a max 3 year prison sentence, but if aggravated can pull 10 years). Generating it is ALSO a criminal offense.
@cstross @futurebird @GossiTheDog how is the llc giving these people a fig leaf for overt criminal, morally reprehensible, actions?
-
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
Truth!
-
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
Cisco has an inflated view of their own worth.
-
Before we get to the staff members at cyber companies, the Financial Times has the staff at X and xAI. https://www.ft.com/content/ad94db4c-95a0-4c65-bd8d-3b43e1251091
@GossiTheDog my favorite part is the photo of Elon at the end without the need for added clowniness
-
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
@GossiTheDog We should be posting naked images of all the tech bros involved. See how they enjoy it.
-
@futurebird @GossiTheDog Limiting Grok to paid users (here in the UK) probably won't save Grok in the UK, though. Possession of CSAM is a strict liability offense, as is distributing it. Doesn't matter whether it's a paid account or free, it's child pornography (usually a max 3 year prison sentence, but if aggravated can pull 10 years). Generating it is ALSO a criminal offense.
@cstross @futurebird @GossiTheDog
Grok's weights contain CSAM, and it's impossible to identify where in the weights the CSAM is stored.
So obviously the best answer is delete grok.
-
Some Grok users, mostly men, began to demand to see bruising on the bodies of the women, and for blood to be added to the images. Requests to show women tied up and gagged were instantly granted.
‘Add blood, forced smile’
@GossiTheDog Virtual abuse should be classified the same as real abuse. People who enjoy this type of content are sick.
-
Before we get to the staff members at cyber companies, the Financial Times has the staff at X and xAI. https://www.ft.com/content/ad94db4c-95a0-4c65-bd8d-3b43e1251091
@GossiTheDog the last one "who doesn't need an artificial clown face" is a killer.
Let's see if FT has the balls to keep this up. -
Wired has a look at videos created on Grok. Includes knives being inserted into vaginas, “very young” people having sex. Around 10% are CSAM and still online. xAI declined to comment.
https://www.wired.com/story/grok-is-generating-sexual-content-far-more-graphic-than-whats-on-x/
@GossiTheDog this is so utterly disgusting. Regarding all the hypocritical censorship US media used to apply to nudity this shows exactly, how in the Mafia-reigned Washington oligarchy, protégés are obviously free to do whatever they want.
-
I find it interesting that there's loads of people who made a core part of their identity campaigning against trans women being in women's spaces and how it impacts women, who have gone completely silent about Grok being used to undress and brutalise women.
@GossiTheDog awesome!
-
Before we get to the staff members at cyber companies, the Financial Times has the staff at X and xAI. https://www.ft.com/content/ad94db4c-95a0-4c65-bd8d-3b43e1251091
@GossiTheDog The archived page to see the whole gallery: https://archive.ph/2026.01.08-103510/https://www.ft.com/content/ad94db4c-95a0-4c65-bd8d-3b43e1251091
-
The UK PM has asked communication regulator for options around banning Twitter from operating in the UK, due to their refusal to deal with unconsensual undressing of women and girls. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/08/musks-x-could-be-banned-in-britain-over-ai-chatbot-row/
@GossiTheDog Imagining X being banned in the UK and thinking about that scene in the Simpsons when Lionel Hutz imagines a world without lawyers like him and pictures humans of all races and creeds dancing hand in hand in a beautiful landscape. He shudders at the thought.
-
I find it interesting that there's loads of people who made a core part of their identity campaigning against trans women being in women's spaces and how it impacts women, who have gone completely silent about Grok being used to undress and brutalise women.
Yup. It never was about protecting cis women amd girls, and all about hating trans women and girls.
Hate is all they have. Pathetic really.
