I find it interesting that there's loads of people who made a core part of their identity campaigning against trans women being in women's spaces and how it impacts women, who have gone completely silent about Grok being used to undress and brutalise w...
-
The UK PM has asked communication regulator for options around banning Twitter from operating in the UK, due to their refusal to deal with unconsensual undressing of women and girls. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/08/musks-x-could-be-banned-in-britain-over-ai-chatbot-row/
@GossiTheDog Why not just ban Grok for all UK-based users? It's just a Twitter account, isn't it?
-
@GossiTheDog Maybe if someone created nudes of male leaders, with little tiny genitalia, there might be more effort made to stop this.
@wendynather @GossiTheDog people keep suggesting this.
-
This is still happening btw, roughly one a second. People are doing it to female UK MPs and cabinet members, and getting Grok to CC with the images.
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog
> Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon.
Now there's a prompt I really don't need to see the results of. -
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog so now it is a _paid_ AI generated child pornography site. That will teach them...
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog So X is now a commercial CSAM provider?
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
There are now grandma's in bikini in that from:@Grok filter:media feed...
FFS...
(Edit, re-reading this; I obviously did not mean that the other sexual abuse material was better.)
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
So those MPs with paid accounts continue to have access to CSAM generating AI nonsense?
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog regulation works?! Even the threat of regulation works. Huh, who knew?
-
Bloomberg reports Twitter has now become the number one app for deepfake undressing of women by a sizeable amount. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-07/musk-s-grok-ai-generated-thousands-of-undressed-images-per-hour-on-x?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTc2NzgyODQzMywiZXhwIjoxNzY4NDMzMjMzLCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJUOEhRS0hLR0lGUE8wMCIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiI0OEFDOEE5MkEwNTM0MkQ4OEIyRjkwQjhDMTgzMTdDMyJ9.PYX4upGg_MvIrbPiTpwANI8MCqfAJnZFxxFdD-e2OyQ
@GossiTheDog ‘Undressing of women’ sanitises this behaviour. Making non-consensual nudes of women, children (especially female) and of Renee Good’s bloodied murdered body in her car is criminal, pedophile, perverted, obscene. There are far too many mentally sick, (mainly) white men in society, in the world.
-
@GossiTheDog so now it is a _paid_ AI generated child pornography site. That will teach them...
I think the principle is that anyone using it do crime will have their personal information conveniently packaged for the relevant authorities.
Obviously you and me would say "Nobody should be able to do this" but we don't understand business, or something.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog rather than using X just go to grok dot com, seems anything is still fair game, at least from outside the UK.
-
@budgegeria @GossiTheDog
Grok is not so stupid to reveal his identity.
The Homeland Security Secretary - not so much.
The shooter has been identified: https://www.startribune.com/ice-agent-who-fatally-shot-woman-in-minneapolis-is-identified/601560214@jbiserkov @GossiTheDog Since Grok sometimes disobeyed his master, I wouldn't be suprised about that, for what I know about AI.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog So it’s all right to generate dirty pictures of kids as long as you pay for them? It was always thus.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog Right, so they've pivoted from undressing women and underage girls for free, to profiting from it.
For sure they have some rough idea "who" might be using it now rather than it being "anonymous", but it hardly fixes the root problem does it?
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog But still allowing CSAM if you pay for the right.
-
I think the principle is that anyone using it do crime will have their personal information conveniently packaged for the relevant authorities.
Obviously you and me would say "Nobody should be able to do this" but we don't understand business, or something.
@davey_cakes @GossiTheDog what relevant authorities? Someone looking to hire new people to the US administration?
-
@davey_cakes @GossiTheDog what relevant authorities? Someone looking to hire new people to the US administration?
@matus_chochlik @GossiTheDog fuck, at the current rate of going, probably
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
"From now on, we'll only participate in production and distribution of illegal sexual imagery if you pay us" isn't really the principled stance that Musk thinks it is. If anything, it's worse.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog So he's gone from "providing a tool that generates CSAM unregulated" to "providing a tool that generates CSAM for money". Not sure that helps his legal case, if indeed he cares about that.
