Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Douglas Adams wrote, "Anything that is in the world when you're born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.

Douglas Adams wrote, "Anything that is in the world when you're born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
76 Indlæg 21 Posters 146 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

    The world has moved on. 50 years of neoliberal rule has weakened and snapped the beams - the rule of law, consumer and labor rights, civil rights - that radiated from our Dark Tower - antitrust law, which blocked the emergence of the "autocrats of trade." The people who besieged these beams had the same motives as the Crimson King and John Farson and the Man in Black: they were willing to pay any price for a world free from consequences for people like them.

    32/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.fr
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #33

    They knew they were born to rule, and that the rules were "for the little people," that breaking those rules "made them smart."

    They wanted "bossism." Or, as rendered in the original Afrikaans, "baasskap," which means, "the social, political and economic domination of South Africa by its minority white population":

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baasskap

    33/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

      They knew they were born to rule, and that the rules were "for the little people," that breaking those rules "made them smart."

      They wanted "bossism." Or, as rendered in the original Afrikaans, "baasskap," which means, "the social, political and economic domination of South Africa by its minority white population":

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baasskap

      33/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.fr
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #34

      Not for nothing, baasskap is the foundation of Muskism, the ideology that Elon Musk epitomizes, even if he can't articulate it:

      https://pluralistic.net/2026/04/21/torment-nexusism/#marching-to-pretoria

      In "The Utopia of Rules," the late David Graeber described how neoliberal deregulation produced exactly the kind of state that we were warned we'd get under communism.

      34/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

        Not for nothing, baasskap is the foundation of Muskism, the ideology that Elon Musk epitomizes, even if he can't articulate it:

        https://pluralistic.net/2026/04/21/torment-nexusism/#marching-to-pretoria

        In "The Utopia of Rules," the late David Graeber described how neoliberal deregulation produced exactly the kind of state that we were warned we'd get under communism.

        34/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.fr
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #35

        Thanks to monopolies, all the stores were the same and they all sold the same goods. Thanks to the dismantling of labor protection and unions, no one had enough money to get by. Thanks to elite impunity, we were ruled by monsters who committed crimes in the open and thrived as a result. Thanks to unchecked greed, we paid everything we had for healthcare, only to be denied treatment when we needed it.

        35/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

          Thanks to monopolies, all the stores were the same and they all sold the same goods. Thanks to the dismantling of labor protection and unions, no one had enough money to get by. Thanks to elite impunity, we were ruled by monsters who committed crimes in the open and thrived as a result. Thanks to unchecked greed, we paid everything we had for healthcare, only to be denied treatment when we needed it.

          35/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.fr
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #36

          Thanks to the dismantling of the welfare state, more and more of us had to wait in long lines to fill out absurdly long forms in triplicate. Thanks to the intrinsic instability of such a terrible system, more and more of us ended up in prison, and protest became more and more illegal:

          https://memex.craphound.com/2015/02/02/david-graebers-the-utopia-of-rules-on-technology-stupidity-and-the-secret-joys-of-bureaucracy/

          36/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

            Thanks to the dismantling of the welfare state, more and more of us had to wait in long lines to fill out absurdly long forms in triplicate. Thanks to the intrinsic instability of such a terrible system, more and more of us ended up in prison, and protest became more and more illegal:

            https://memex.craphound.com/2015/02/02/david-graebers-the-utopia-of-rules-on-technology-stupidity-and-the-secret-joys-of-bureaucracy/

            36/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.fr
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #37

            Graeber pointed out that the rise of the web made it seductively easy for people in authority to force us to fill in forms. When analog bureaucracies impose paperwork costs on us, they also impose paperwork costs *on themselves*, because processing and filing those forms requires substantial effort, even if filling in those forms requires even more effort from us.

            37/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

              Graeber pointed out that the rise of the web made it seductively easy for people in authority to force us to fill in forms. When analog bureaucracies impose paperwork costs on us, they also impose paperwork costs *on themselves*, because processing and filing those forms requires substantial effort, even if filling in those forms requires even more effort from us.

              37/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.fr
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #38

              When it comes to *virtual* paperwork, the asymmetry is even more pronounced. Sure, it takes some admin to set up an online form and write the scripts to process its outputs, but that's a one-off. The form-giver can perform a very little admin and still impose a giant, repeated admin burden on the rest of us.

              38/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                When it comes to *virtual* paperwork, the asymmetry is even more pronounced. Sure, it takes some admin to set up an online form and write the scripts to process its outputs, but that's a one-off. The form-giver can perform a very little admin and still impose a giant, repeated admin burden on the rest of us.

                38/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #39

                AI has only made this worse. Now, thanks to vibe coding, everyone can produce a form and its associated processing and analytics back-end with prompts, which creates a grave moral hazard. The kinds of activities that I used to fill in a single short form to accomplish now requires ten lengthy forms, created by different people in the same organization, all asking for variations on the same information. Through AI, we have democratized bureaucracy. It's Kafka-as-a-service.

                39/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                  AI has only made this worse. Now, thanks to vibe coding, everyone can produce a form and its associated processing and analytics back-end with prompts, which creates a grave moral hazard. The kinds of activities that I used to fill in a single short form to accomplish now requires ten lengthy forms, created by different people in the same organization, all asking for variations on the same information. Through AI, we have democratized bureaucracy. It's Kafka-as-a-service.

                  39/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #40

                  What's more, when you're dealing with a monopoly, you have no choice but to complete whatever paperwork they throw at you. And when the vibe-coded back-end scripts shit the bed and lose or misinterpret your data, you have no choice but to endure an infinite telephone hold queue (if you're lucky) or get shunted to a customer service bot (if you're unlucky):

                  https://pluralistic.net/2025/11/11/sorry-to-bother-you/#we-dont-care-we-dont-have-to

                  40/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    What's more, when you're dealing with a monopoly, you have no choice but to complete whatever paperwork they throw at you. And when the vibe-coded back-end scripts shit the bed and lose or misinterpret your data, you have no choice but to endure an infinite telephone hold queue (if you're lucky) or get shunted to a customer service bot (if you're unlucky):

                    https://pluralistic.net/2025/11/11/sorry-to-bother-you/#we-dont-care-we-dont-have-to

                    40/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #41

                    It's entirely possible to build webforms that are thoughtful, fast, respectful of our time, and well-processed. The problem is that fielding these forms requires that the form-giver undertake some intensive, moderately expensive work (once), while skipping this step merely requires that we all perform intensive, time-consuming work (over and over and over again):

                    https://mohkohn.co.uk/writing/html-first/

                    41/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                      It's entirely possible to build webforms that are thoughtful, fast, respectful of our time, and well-processed. The problem is that fielding these forms requires that the form-giver undertake some intensive, moderately expensive work (once), while skipping this step merely requires that we all perform intensive, time-consuming work (over and over and over again):

                      https://mohkohn.co.uk/writing/html-first/

                      41/

                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #42

                      This is how we end up with government forms that require you to list every trip you have ever taken to the USA, since your infancy, with every flight number, which you can only get help with by talking to a chatbot that emails you an out-of-date PDF no matter what question you ask of it:

                      https://pluralistic.net/2026/02/06/doge-ball/#n-600

                      42/

                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                        This is how we end up with government forms that require you to list every trip you have ever taken to the USA, since your infancy, with every flight number, which you can only get help with by talking to a chatbot that emails you an out-of-date PDF no matter what question you ask of it:

                        https://pluralistic.net/2026/02/06/doge-ball/#n-600

                        42/

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #43

                        This is how we end up with massive customer service queues, long lines at tills, and no one at the gate to answer your questions when your flight is canceled. Understaffing is a form of enshittification, one that shifts value from shoppers to owners, and shifts consequences from owners to workers:

                        https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/22/nobodys-home/#squeeze-that-hog

                        43/

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                          This is how we end up with massive customer service queues, long lines at tills, and no one at the gate to answer your questions when your flight is canceled. Understaffing is a form of enshittification, one that shifts value from shoppers to owners, and shifts consequences from owners to workers:

                          https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/22/nobodys-home/#squeeze-that-hog

                          43/

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #44

                          This is how we end up with broken machines that no one can fix. Firing workers and replacing them with chatbots or contractors means incinerating their process knowledge - the precious, inchoate, unrecorded understanding that keeps everything working:

                          https://pluralistic.net/2026/04/08/process-knowledge-vs-bosses/#wash-dishes-cut-wood

                          44/

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                            This is how we end up with broken machines that no one can fix. Firing workers and replacing them with chatbots or contractors means incinerating their process knowledge - the precious, inchoate, unrecorded understanding that keeps everything working:

                            https://pluralistic.net/2026/04/08/process-knowledge-vs-bosses/#wash-dishes-cut-wood

                            44/

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.fr
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #45

                            This is how companies that make products we love suddenly decide to wreck those products: when the only consequences for shitty products is angry customers with nowhere to go and no one to vent their rage upon except workers who have no labor rights and can't afford to quit, why *not* do a mafia bust-out for every business?

                            https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/28/microincentives-and-enshittification/

                            45/

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                              This is how companies that make products we love suddenly decide to wreck those products: when the only consequences for shitty products is angry customers with nowhere to go and no one to vent their rage upon except workers who have no labor rights and can't afford to quit, why *not* do a mafia bust-out for every business?

                              https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/28/microincentives-and-enshittification/

                              45/

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pluralistic@mamot.fr
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #46

                              The world has moved on. Nothing works. Everything costs too much. No one can help. No one knows how to fix anything. The beams were broken by the Crimson King and his economism-crazed minions. The Dark Tower might fall.

                              So what consumer advice do I have for people who are angry about this? I don't have *any* consumer advice, I'm afraid. You can't shop your way out of a monopoly. Once again, shopping *is not politics*.

                              46/

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                The world has moved on. Nothing works. Everything costs too much. No one can help. No one knows how to fix anything. The beams were broken by the Crimson King and his economism-crazed minions. The Dark Tower might fall.

                                So what consumer advice do I have for people who are angry about this? I don't have *any* consumer advice, I'm afraid. You can't shop your way out of a monopoly. Once again, shopping *is not politics*.

                                46/

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #47

                                What I have for you is *political* advice. To restore the beams and beat back entropy again, we need a better *system*, not more virtuous individuals. If you feel - as I do - that "the world has moved on," then to wrench it back, you will have to join a *polity*. Support activist groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the digital rights group I've been at for the past 25 years:

                                https://supporters.eff.org/donate/join-eff

                                47/

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                  What I have for you is *political* advice. To restore the beams and beat back entropy again, we need a better *system*, not more virtuous individuals. If you feel - as I do - that "the world has moved on," then to wrench it back, you will have to join a *polity*. Support activist groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the digital rights group I've been at for the past 25 years:

                                  https://supporters.eff.org/donate/join-eff

                                  47/

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #48

                                  Join a union. If there's no union at your jobsite, start a union. If you work in tech, you start this process by talking to techsolidarity.org and the techworkerscoalition.org. In the UK, get in touch with United Tech and Allied Workers:

                                  https://utaw.tech/

                                  48/

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                    Join a union. If there's no union at your jobsite, start a union. If you work in tech, you start this process by talking to techsolidarity.org and the techworkerscoalition.org. In the UK, get in touch with United Tech and Allied Workers:

                                    https://utaw.tech/

                                    48/

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #49

                                    Get involved in party politics. Find a political party whose local organization supports your values (even if the national version of that party sucks) and then work with your fellow grassroots activists to drag or replace the party leaders.

                                    49/

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                      Get involved in party politics. Find a political party whose local organization supports your values (even if the national version of that party sucks) and then work with your fellow grassroots activists to drag or replace the party leaders.

                                      49/

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #50

                                      Get involved in local politics: if there's one thing Moms For Liberty has taught us, it's that unregarded, seemingly unimportant local offices have enormous potential to change facts on the ground for the people where you live. Those changes don't have to be change for the worse.

                                      Doing politics is hard. Hell, after all, is other people. It would be great if we could make change by changing ourselves, but that's not how any of this works.

                                      50/

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                        Get involved in local politics: if there's one thing Moms For Liberty has taught us, it's that unregarded, seemingly unimportant local offices have enormous potential to change facts on the ground for the people where you live. Those changes don't have to be change for the worse.

                                        Doing politics is hard. Hell, after all, is other people. It would be great if we could make change by changing ourselves, but that's not how any of this works.

                                        50/

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #51

                                        The world has moved on, and *you* can't save it. But together, *we* can restore the beams and beat back entropy. Hell is other people, but only because other people are so *great* but it's so hard to figure out how to work together. We can do it, though. We did it with the post-war settlement, the 30 glorious years when we built the welfare state, regulated polluters and bosses, and kicked off the civil rights movement.

                                        51/

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                          The world has moved on, and *you* can't save it. But together, *we* can restore the beams and beat back entropy. Hell is other people, but only because other people are so *great* but it's so hard to figure out how to work together. We can do it, though. We did it with the post-war settlement, the 30 glorious years when we built the welfare state, regulated polluters and bosses, and kicked off the civil rights movement.

                                          51/

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #52

                                          We did it then, and we can do it again. We must. All things serve the beams.

                                          eof/

                                          maybeimaleo@sfba.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper