Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "At least you've got job security"

"At least you've got job security"

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
6 Indlæg 3 Posters 19 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    munin@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    "At least you've got job security"

    I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

    No, I don't.

    My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

    Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

    Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

    And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

    So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

    nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN munin@infosec.exchangeM aburka@hachyderm.ioA 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

      "At least you've got job security"

      I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

      No, I don't.

      My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

      Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

      Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

      And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

      So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

      nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
      nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
      nosirrahsec@infosec.exchange
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @munin Yup, I'm so secure right now.

      SO SECURE

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

        "At least you've got job security"

        I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

        No, I don't.

        My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

        Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

        Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

        And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

        So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

        munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
        munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
        munin@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        Furthermore I have -zero- interest in cleaning up -this- mess once the LLMs have turbofucked everyone and ground their infrastructure into unusable rubbish.

        Like, seriously, if you ripped out the engine of your car and replaced it with a vat of shit-flavored pudding, do you think that your mechanic would appreciate seeing that towed into her service bay? Especially if you were demanding that it be fixed without the appropriate budget and resources to hazmat-vaporize the fecal slurry and replace it with OEM spec parts?

        munin@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

          Furthermore I have -zero- interest in cleaning up -this- mess once the LLMs have turbofucked everyone and ground their infrastructure into unusable rubbish.

          Like, seriously, if you ripped out the engine of your car and replaced it with a vat of shit-flavored pudding, do you think that your mechanic would appreciate seeing that towed into her service bay? Especially if you were demanding that it be fixed without the appropriate budget and resources to hazmat-vaporize the fecal slurry and replace it with OEM spec parts?

          munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          munin@infosec.exchange
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          Not to mention - there's no fucking juniors out there being hired, so I have to do all the scut work that you normally use to -train- juniors, if I want it done right, because - surprise! - nobody's fucking hiring juniors on because they believe the fucking LLM jockeys' bullshit promises.

          Anthropic and everyone like them can go fucking eat shit.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

            "At least you've got job security"

            I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

            No, I don't.

            My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

            Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

            Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

            And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

            So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

            aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
            aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
            aburka@hachyderm.io
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @munin this is what I keep yelling at coworkers... even if we technical professionals can see past the facade, the decision makers with power over us cannot

            munin@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • aburka@hachyderm.ioA aburka@hachyderm.io

              @munin this is what I keep yelling at coworkers... even if we technical professionals can see past the facade, the decision makers with power over us cannot

              munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
              munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
              munin@infosec.exchange
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @aburka

              these assholes can't be trusted with money

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • bogwitch@social.data.coopB bogwitch@social.data.coop shared this topic
              Svar
              • Svar som emne
              Login for at svare
              • Ældste til nyeste
              • Nyeste til ældste
              • Most Votes


              • Log ind

              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

              • Login or register to search.
              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              Graciously hosted by data.coop
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Hjem
              • Seneste
              • Etiketter
              • Populære
              • Verden
              • Bruger
              • Grupper