Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Today's threads (a thread)

Today's threads (a thread)

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
pluralistic
24 Indlæg 7 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

    Today's threads (a thread)

    Inside: A Pascal's Wager for AI Doomers; and more!

    Archived at: https://pluralistic.net/2026/04/16/pascals-wager/

    #Pluralistic

    1/

    openrisk@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    openrisk@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    openrisk@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #21

    @pluralistic

    There is no doubt that Bengio is both very smart and a decent mensch. And he can still be wrong about how advanced "AI" can become. Wrong in the way any deeply learned scientist may simply have wrong intuitions.

    Now, who can say what can happen in 100 years? But first we need to (collectively) get to that age, which means solving known and imminent problems, which means building the communication tools that will support problem solving at scales we havent done anytime before.

    a_cubed@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.fr
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #22

      @zorrobandito thank you!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • openrisk@mastodon.socialO openrisk@mastodon.social

        @pluralistic

        There is no doubt that Bengio is both very smart and a decent mensch. And he can still be wrong about how advanced "AI" can become. Wrong in the way any deeply learned scientist may simply have wrong intuitions.

        Now, who can say what can happen in 100 years? But first we need to (collectively) get to that age, which means solving known and imminent problems, which means building the communication tools that will support problem solving at scales we havent done anytime before.

        a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        a_cubed@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #23

        @openrisk @pluralistic
        Clarke's First Law:
        When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.

        Asimov's corollary:
        When, however, the lay public rallies round an idea that is denounced by distinguished but elderly scientists and supports that idea with great fervour and emotion – the distinguished but elderly scientists are then, after all, probably right.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS sleepy62@social.vivaldi.net

          @pluralistic

          Nice 👏
          Best line of the essay: 😆

          "the artificial lifeforms that worry me aren't hypothetical – they're here today, amongst us, endangering the very survival of our species. These artificial lifeforms are called "limited liability corporations" and they are a concrete, imminent risk to the human race"

          cloud_dweller@kolektiva.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cloud_dweller@kolektiva.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cloud_dweller@kolektiva.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #24

          @sleepy62 @pluralistic whoever decided they got to have limited liability is a name we should know and curse regularly.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tokeriis@helvede.netT tokeriis@helvede.net shared this topic
          Svar
          • Svar som emne
          Login for at svare
          • Ældste til nyeste
          • Nyeste til ældste
          • Most Votes


          • Log ind

          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          Graciously hosted by data.coop
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Hjem
          • Seneste
          • Etiketter
          • Populære
          • Verden
          • Bruger
          • Grupper