Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 2015: "Not using AWS or CloudFlare is an availability risk, because DDoS"

2015: "Not using AWS or CloudFlare is an availability risk, because DDoS"

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
3 Indlæg 3 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • soatok@furry.engineerS This user is from outside of this forum
    soatok@furry.engineerS This user is from outside of this forum
    soatok@furry.engineer
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    2015: "Not using AWS or CloudFlare is an availability risk, because DDoS"

    2025: "Using AWS or CloudFlare is an availability risk, because surprise outages"

    scipoltech@mastodon.onlineS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • soatok@furry.engineerS soatok@furry.engineer

      2015: "Not using AWS or CloudFlare is an availability risk, because DDoS"

      2025: "Using AWS or CloudFlare is an availability risk, because surprise outages"

      scipoltech@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
      scipoltech@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
      scipoltech@mastodon.online
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @soatok yep. And wouldn't it be better for (nearly) everyone if individual sites or services had occasional issues rather than building single points of failure in to huge swaths of global infrastructure while entrenching monopolies?

      niels@social.data.coopN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • scipoltech@mastodon.onlineS scipoltech@mastodon.online

        @soatok yep. And wouldn't it be better for (nearly) everyone if individual sites or services had occasional issues rather than building single points of failure in to huge swaths of global infrastructure while entrenching monopolies?

        niels@social.data.coopN This user is from outside of this forum
        niels@social.data.coopN This user is from outside of this forum
        niels@social.data.coop
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @SciPolTech
        Absolutely not. If your site is down and no one else's is, you'll be blamed.

        If everyone's down? No probs!
        @soatok

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Svar
        • Svar som emne
        Login for at svare
        • Ældste til nyeste
        • Nyeste til ældste
        • Most Votes


        • Log ind

        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        Graciously hosted by data.coop
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Hjem
        • Seneste
        • Etiketter
        • Populære
        • Verden
        • Bruger
        • Grupper