Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere just hit a ‘depressing’ new recordhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/carbon-dioxide-levels-in-the-atmosphere-just-hit-a-depressing-record-high/

Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere just hit a ‘depressing’ new recordhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/carbon-dioxide-levels-in-the-atmosphere-just-hit-a-depressing-record-high/

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
18 Indlæg 13 Posters 81 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

    "Supporters of economic theories known as “degrowth” or “post-growth” say that capitalism’s pursuit of growth, along with the relentless consumption and production needed to sustain it, has run its course. They point to rising inequality, exceeding natural planetary boundaries and geopolitical struggles over scarcer energy resources."

    https://theconversation.com/is-this-the-moment-to-change-the-way-we-think-about-economic-growth-281747

    saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
    saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
    saltywizard@beige.party
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #9

    @gerrymcgovern

    tune out, turn off, and drop in!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lucybeahere@mstdn.socialL lucybeahere@mstdn.social

      @gerrymcgovern

      But someone told me that increased energy consumption is fine bc renewables will cover it all! So frustrating.

      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #10

      @lucybeahere yeah, it's such a sweet, compelling sell, isn't it? The Green Transition to the sunny uplands of guilt-free consumption. What could go wrong?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

        Degrowth is the only hope

        "Resources are dwindling, including minerals, timber, water, and soils. Almost all ecosystems are being damaged, including the atmosphere, oceans, and forests. Species are being lost at an alarming rate. Seven of the nine major “planetary boundaries” impacts have now exceeded safe levels."

        https://www.resilience.org/stories/2026-05-05/transition-towns-are-key-to-degrowth-but-current-movements-remain-too-reformist/

        julesbl@mastodon.me.ukJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julesbl@mastodon.me.ukJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julesbl@mastodon.me.uk
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #11

        @gerrymcgovern
        Let's start by turning off all the LLMs

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

          Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere just hit a ‘depressing’ new record
          https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/carbon-dioxide-levels-in-the-atmosphere-just-hit-a-depressing-record-high/

          Solar energy is reaching record highs.

          Wind energy is reaching record highs

          Coal energy is reaching record highs

          Oil and gas energy are reaching record highs.

          The problem is growth. We live in the final stages of a Growth Death Cult.

          We are in the worst of all worlds:
          More wood
          More coal
          More oil
          More gas
          More hydro
          More nuclear
          More wind
          More solar

          It's an energy CONSUMPTION crisis.

          gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
          gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
          gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #12

          @gerrymcgovern well, they need to fuel the AI datacenter.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

            @gerrymcgovern we all know it's not sustainable. we've known for a long time. imo what has to change is investment attitude. we have to move away from gambling back towards long term investments that care about sustainability over short term profit.

            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #13

            @gerrymcgovern i'm thinking that maybe this will solve itself on its own, because when everyone does the same on a market, they usually leave a niche. the smart money might be "rediscovered" in the sustainable investment "niche". the thing is, it doesn't make waves. it isn't loud. it's unhypable.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

              Degrowth is the only hope

              "Resources are dwindling, including minerals, timber, water, and soils. Almost all ecosystems are being damaged, including the atmosphere, oceans, and forests. Species are being lost at an alarming rate. Seven of the nine major “planetary boundaries” impacts have now exceeded safe levels."

              https://www.resilience.org/stories/2026-05-05/transition-towns-are-key-to-degrowth-but-current-movements-remain-too-reformist/

              arsimael@social.khajiit.deA This user is from outside of this forum
              arsimael@social.khajiit.deA This user is from outside of this forum
              arsimael@social.khajiit.de
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #14

              @gerrymcgovern We dont need "degrowth". We just need to stop using energy for:
              - cryptocurrency
              - ai everything
              - ads everywhere
              - producing stuff "to throw it in the trash"

              ...
              Oh...

              ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU davide_sandini@mastodon.unoD franceskamann@freeradical.zoneF 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • arsimael@social.khajiit.deA arsimael@social.khajiit.de

                @gerrymcgovern We dont need "degrowth". We just need to stop using energy for:
                - cryptocurrency
                - ai everything
                - ads everywhere
                - producing stuff "to throw it in the trash"

                ...
                Oh...

                ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #15

                @Arsimael @gerrymcgovern I disagree - we DO need degrowth, as well as those.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • arsimael@social.khajiit.deA arsimael@social.khajiit.de

                  @gerrymcgovern We dont need "degrowth". We just need to stop using energy for:
                  - cryptocurrency
                  - ai everything
                  - ads everywhere
                  - producing stuff "to throw it in the trash"

                  ...
                  Oh...

                  davide_sandini@mastodon.unoD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davide_sandini@mastodon.unoD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davide_sandini@mastodon.uno
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #16

                  @Arsimael
                  Indeed this is a degrowth, but only for oligarchs's pockets.. This is why they are scared of.
                  @gerrymcgovern

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • arsimael@social.khajiit.deA arsimael@social.khajiit.de

                    @gerrymcgovern We dont need "degrowth". We just need to stop using energy for:
                    - cryptocurrency
                    - ai everything
                    - ads everywhere
                    - producing stuff "to throw it in the trash"

                    ...
                    Oh...

                    franceskamann@freeradical.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                    franceskamann@freeradical.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                    franceskamann@freeradical.zone
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #17

                    @Arsimael @gerrymcgovern

                    We do need degrowth. We need 1.7 earths to support our humanity as we are.

                    arsimael@social.khajiit.deA 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • franceskamann@freeradical.zoneF franceskamann@freeradical.zone

                      @Arsimael @gerrymcgovern

                      We do need degrowth. We need 1.7 earths to support our humanity as we are.

                      arsimael@social.khajiit.deA This user is from outside of this forum
                      arsimael@social.khajiit.deA This user is from outside of this forum
                      arsimael@social.khajiit.de
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #18

                      @FranceskaMann @gerrymcgovern We are already running towards a huge "degrowth". Look at the population charts.
                      Nearly every western and 'developed' Nation is below a birthrate of 2. Two Children per couple are needed to keep the population at the same size. All 'first world' nations are shrinking.

                      https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tokeriis@helvede.netT tokeriis@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper