Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 🇩🇪EU-Parlament lässt #Chatkontrolle 1.0 trotz Mehrheits‑Nein (314:276) passieren – Massenscans privater Chats bis 2028 erlaubt.

🇩🇪EU-Parlament lässt #Chatkontrolle 1.0 trotz Mehrheits‑Nein (314:276) passieren – Massenscans privater Chats bis 2028 erlaubt.

Planlagt Fastgjort LÃ¥st Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
chatkontrolledemokratiefail
47 Indlæg 33 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

    🇪🇺 The European Parliament lets #ChatControl 1.0 go through despite a majority voting against it (314:276) – allowing mass scanning of private chats until 2028. Survivors are warning. My analysis and why this is the wrong approach 👇

    https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/

    #DemocracyFail

    zdl@gamerplus.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
    zdl@gamerplus.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
    zdl@gamerplus.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #38

    @echo_pbreyer I'm confused. If the majority voted against it, how did it go through? What is the point of the vote?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • smallcircles@social.coopS smallcircles@social.coop

      @nikthechampiongr @echo_pbreyer

      There's a discussion on HN again, where the matter gained a lot of attention the past couple weeks.

      One person clearly named in top comment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberta_Metsola

      > "Roberta Metsola's actions this week jeopardise the legitimacy of the EU project as a whole."

      Another comment about "What is coming back" with #ChatControl 1.0:

      > "US tech companies are once again allowed to scan private messages without a warrant or prior suspicion. This affects direct messages on platforms like Instagram, Discord, Snapchat, Skype, and Xbox, as well as emails via Google’s Gmail and Apple’s iCloud."

      https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843923

      V This user is from outside of this forum
      V This user is from outside of this forum
      vurk@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #39

      @smallcircles @nikthechampiongr @echo_pbreyer She is also fully against womens' right to choose (all historic votes) and is married to Ukko Metsola, top lobbyist for the Royal Caribbean Group, one of the biggest air and water polluting cruise companies.

      Curious how environmental protections are rolled back under her presidency - I'm sure it's just coincidence right? Right?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gegenwind@chaos.socialG gegenwind@chaos.social

        @echo_pbreyer

        kalauer@digitalcourage.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        kalauer@digitalcourage.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        kalauer@digitalcourage.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #40

        @Gegenwind @echo_pbreyer Könnte das etwa etwas mit Korruption zu tun haben? Wundert mich, dass sie mit Zuckerberg kein Händchen hält ...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

          🇪🇺 The European Parliament lets #ChatControl 1.0 go through despite a majority voting against it (314:276) – allowing mass scanning of private chats until 2028. Survivors are warning. My analysis and why this is the wrong approach 👇

          https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/

          #DemocracyFail

          amici@fribygda.noA This user is from outside of this forum
          amici@fribygda.noA This user is from outside of this forum
          amici@fribygda.no
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #41

          @echo_pbreyer

          this is the kind of reason why I'm an anarchist and find our examples of "democracy" to be always corrupt

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

            🇪🇸 🇪🇺 El Parlamento Europeo deja pasar el #ChatControl 1.0 pese a que una mayoría votó en contra (314:276), permitiendo el escaneo masivo de chats privados hasta 2028. Las víctimas advierten de sus riesgos. Mi análisis 👇

            https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/

            #FracasoDemocrático

            duub@social.anartist.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            duub@social.anartist.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            duub@social.anartist.org
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #42

            @echo_pbreyer porque si perdió... Ganó??? 😫

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

              🇩🇪EU-Parlament lässt #Chatkontrolle 1.0 trotz Mehrheits‑Nein (314:276) passieren – Massenscans privater Chats bis 2028 erlaubt. Betroffene warnen. Meine Einordnung und warum das der falsche Weg ist 👇
              https://www.patrick-breyer.de/eu-parlament-winkt-chatkontrolle-1-0-durch-breyer-wahrer-verlierer-sind-unsere-kinder/
              #Demokratiefail

              idova@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              idova@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              idova@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #43

              @echo_pbreyer Ich kann mir das nur so erklären, das bestimmte Kreise ein Faschismus vorbereiten und damit sie damit durchkommen, brauchen sie diese Tools.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

                🇪🇺 The European Parliament lets #ChatControl 1.0 go through despite a majority voting against it (314:276) – allowing mass scanning of private chats until 2028. Survivors are warning. My analysis and why this is the wrong approach 👇

                https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/

                #DemocracyFail

                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                prometheuspetrosss@mas.to
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #44

                @echo_pbreyer #reticulum
                https://reticulum.network/

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

                  🇪🇺 The European Parliament lets #ChatControl 1.0 go through despite a majority voting against it (314:276) – allowing mass scanning of private chats until 2028. Survivors are warning. My analysis and why this is the wrong approach 👇

                  https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/

                  #DemocracyFail

                  smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                  smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                  smallcircles@social.coop
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #45

                  In a geopolitical time and new world order where the #EU has great opportunity for positive change, the #EUParliament and @EUCommission pulled a great marketing ploy on #ChatControl ..

                  The top upvoted comment on the very popular discussion thread on HN relating to @echo_pbreyer article says it all:

                  > The EU is a farce, an undemocratic virtue signaling organization.

                  Then sums up the farcical sad state of affairs, and ending with:

                  > In PRACTICALITY, the Commission can pursue any agenda whenever and however they want, and throw the votes down the drain. EU's #democracy is lipstick on a pig.

                  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843923

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

                    🇩🇪EU-Parlament lässt #Chatkontrolle 1.0 trotz Mehrheits‑Nein (314:276) passieren – Massenscans privater Chats bis 2028 erlaubt. Betroffene warnen. Meine Einordnung und warum das der falsche Weg ist 👇
                    https://www.patrick-breyer.de/eu-parlament-winkt-chatkontrolle-1-0-durch-breyer-wahrer-verlierer-sind-unsere-kinder/
                    #Demokratiefail

                    abrhpositiv2@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    abrhpositiv2@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    abrhpositiv2@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #46

                    @echo_pbreyer I do not like it. That should not happen. Why they do such things? That is not legal? How we can stopp it quickly? #StopChatcontrol

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • flower2thepeople@wehavecookies.socialF flower2thepeople@wehavecookies.social

                      @HaTetsu @bjorn @echo_pbreyer what I didnt get is: if theres no absolute NO-Majority, then there is also no absolute YES-Majority...

                      bjorn@mastodon.greenB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bjorn@mastodon.greenB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bjorn@mastodon.green
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #47

                      @flower2thepeople @HaTetsu @echo_pbreyer Yeah true. And the IMHO shady thing is that the previous voting had different rules for majority than this one. Also the timing is awkard, in the middle of summer. Some MEP's might have been on holiday already, making it even harder to reject.

                      I am in general pro EU, but I don't agree with the way this was handled.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bettina@mastodon.nuB bettina@mastodon.nu shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper