Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Time to make 2025 updates to my annual “opinions about solar” thread.

Time to make 2025 updates to my annual “opinions about solar” thread.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
47 Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • solar_chase@mastodon.greenS solar_chase@mastodon.green

    45. Some governments are definitely out to fight against a better future.

    46. Achieving a net-zero energy transition, for most countries, will not look like winning a war or marching into a capital waving flags. It will be the ability to say "no thank you, we do not want what you are selling" to the petrostates, and walking (or cycling, or taking an electric bus, or driving an EV) away.

    solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
    solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
    solar_chase@mastodon.green
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #41

    47. While moving to a circular economy with 100% recycling rates is essential in the long run, it’s not a challenge for PV in particular; few PV panels have been recycled to date only because the vast majority are still in use. It can be, and is, done.

    Volumes are still tiny compared with most things we also have to recycle.

    solar_chase@mastodon.greenS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • solar_chase@mastodon.greenS solar_chase@mastodon.green

      47. While moving to a circular economy with 100% recycling rates is essential in the long run, it’s not a challenge for PV in particular; few PV panels have been recycled to date only because the vast majority are still in use. It can be, and is, done.

      Volumes are still tiny compared with most things we also have to recycle.

      solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
      solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
      solar_chase@mastodon.green
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #42

      48. Floating solar, agrivoltaics, balcony solar: yes you can put solar panels on anything that stands still long enough. If you have a lightweight encapsulant, you can also put them on something that moves.

      The decision comes down to: in this use case, will the solar panels get in the way, and will they get broken by normal activities?

      solar_chase@mastodon.greenS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • solar_chase@mastodon.greenS solar_chase@mastodon.green

        48. Floating solar, agrivoltaics, balcony solar: yes you can put solar panels on anything that stands still long enough. If you have a lightweight encapsulant, you can also put them on something that moves.

        The decision comes down to: in this use case, will the solar panels get in the way, and will they get broken by normal activities?

        solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
        solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
        solar_chase@mastodon.green
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #43

        49. 'Agrivoltaics' is defined as 'solar that gets preferential legal / permitting treatment applying to agrivoltaics projects' and therefore the definition is local. It's not really a different technology and so a general statement on it is not really possible.

        It's harder to harvest crops and work land under solar panels, so many owners may quietly drop the farming bit once support is secured.

        solar_chase@mastodon.greenS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • solar_chase@mastodon.greenS solar_chase@mastodon.green

          49. 'Agrivoltaics' is defined as 'solar that gets preferential legal / permitting treatment applying to agrivoltaics projects' and therefore the definition is local. It's not really a different technology and so a general statement on it is not really possible.

          It's harder to harvest crops and work land under solar panels, so many owners may quietly drop the farming bit once support is secured.

          solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
          solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
          solar_chase@mastodon.green
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #44

          50. Grazing sheep under solar panels should not qualify them for agrivoltaics support. Solar subsidising sheep farming is not particularly an environmental plus.

          (Some crops do seem to work well with PV, for example shade-tolerant berries, and in some climates, vegetables for which growth isn't limited by light availability. Farming involves a lot of optimising for local conditions and so often the answer to 'what works?' will be 'it depends....').

          solar_chase@mastodon.greenS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • solar_chase@mastodon.greenS solar_chase@mastodon.green

            50. Grazing sheep under solar panels should not qualify them for agrivoltaics support. Solar subsidising sheep farming is not particularly an environmental plus.

            (Some crops do seem to work well with PV, for example shade-tolerant berries, and in some climates, vegetables for which growth isn't limited by light availability. Farming involves a lot of optimising for local conditions and so often the answer to 'what works?' will be 'it depends....').

            solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
            solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
            solar_chase@mastodon.green
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #45

            51. For 6 years I have been refusing to get excited about perovskites until a perovskite company can disclose a commercial partnership with a named major module manufacturer. They have now. Still not excited.

            Crystalline silicon is honestly good enough.

            solar_chase@mastodon.greenS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • solar_chase@mastodon.greenS solar_chase@mastodon.green

              51. For 6 years I have been refusing to get excited about perovskites until a perovskite company can disclose a commercial partnership with a named major module manufacturer. They have now. Still not excited.

              Crystalline silicon is honestly good enough.

              solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
              solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
              solar_chase@mastodon.green
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #46

              52. Get your rooftop solar system built when you have scaffolding up for something else, 'cos scaffolding is expensive. Ideally build it when you’re building the roof, there will never be a better time. Rooftop solar mandates are good but don't do much unless you are adding a lot of new buildings, which most developed countries aren't.

              solar_chase@mastodon.greenS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • solar_chase@mastodon.greenS solar_chase@mastodon.green

                52. Get your rooftop solar system built when you have scaffolding up for something else, 'cos scaffolding is expensive. Ideally build it when you’re building the roof, there will never be a better time. Rooftop solar mandates are good but don't do much unless you are adding a lot of new buildings, which most developed countries aren't.

                solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
                solar_chase@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
                solar_chase@mastodon.green
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #47

                53. Anyone buying a new internal combustion car now is silly. EVs aren’t the answer to everything – especially congestion of cities – but they do use much less energy, it's relatively easy-to-decarbonise energy, and, with flexibility, they can support the grid.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                  suneauken@mastodon.worldS suneauken@mastodon.world shared this topic
                Svar
                • Svar som emne
                Login for at svare
                • Ældste til nyeste
                • Nyeste til ældste
                • Most Votes


                • Log ind

                • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                • Login or register to search.
                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                Graciously hosted by data.coop
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Hjem
                • Seneste
                • Etiketter
                • Populære
                • Verden
                • Bruger
                • Grupper