Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
57 Indlæg 40 Posters 156 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

    With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

    "Bug 2011195 - When an agent commits, don't add itself as author"

    https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/71cc24b6a400dbd434e4df37087960d94b764791

    I don't think it's a good thing that Mozilla seem to be explicitly encouraging unattributed LLM code in Firefox.

    jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #16

    @sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social ffs mozilla is the worst ​​

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • linear@nya.socialL linear@nya.social
      @sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social according to my understanding of current copyright guidance in the United States, doing this means they forfeit their copyright to the entire Firefox codebase.
      mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
      mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
      mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #17

      @sarahjamielewis @linear no, it just means that the slop output is not copyrightable as a work in itself

      (it’s still encumbered by the licences (or lack thereof) of all the stolen works they fed it with)

      linear@nya.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org

        @sarahjamielewis oooooooohhh ffffffuuuuuuuuuu what even is this timeline I cannot any more

        mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
        mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
        mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #18

        @sarahjamielewis and that was sylvestre?

        Will he add slop to the Dehian package, too?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • slyborg@vmst.ioS slyborg@vmst.io

          @jbowen >not just reading the OTA traffic in Wireshark
          You get used to it, I don’t even see the code, just “blonde… brunette… redhead…”

          jbowen@mast.hpc.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jbowen@mast.hpc.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jbowen@mast.hpc.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #19

          @slyborg
          That's... gross

          gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org

            @sarahjamielewis @linear no, it just means that the slop output is not copyrightable as a work in itself

            (it’s still encumbered by the licences (or lack thereof) of all the stolen works they fed it with)

            linear@nya.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            linear@nya.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            linear@nya.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #20
            @mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org

            my understanding is that what you said is the case if it is disclosed, or failing that as in this case, can be determined after the fact:

            "Zarya of the Dawn: A February 2023 decision that AI-generated illustrations for a graphic novel were not copyrightable, although the human-authored text of the novel and overall selection and arrangement of the images and text in the novel could be copyrighted."

            but that if it is not disclosed, and the AI-generated output cannot be separated upon request from that made by humans, then the entire work is at risk:

            "Théâtre D’opéra Spatial: A September 2023 decision that an artwork generated by AI and then modified by the applicant could not be copyrighted, since the applicant failed to identify and disclaim the AI-generated portions of the work as required by the AI
            Guidance."
            mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jbowen@mast.hpc.socialJ jbowen@mast.hpc.social

              @sarahjamielewis
              Yet another reason to abandon Firefox and Mozilla in general.

              Edit: Use NetSurf or Lynx. Or just curl or wget.

              rusty__shackleford@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rusty__shackleford@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rusty__shackleford@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #21

              @jbowen @sarahjamielewis

              Re: https://mastodon.social/@rusty__shackleford/116115426047925246

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • linear@nya.socialL linear@nya.social
                @mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org

                my understanding is that what you said is the case if it is disclosed, or failing that as in this case, can be determined after the fact:

                "Zarya of the Dawn: A February 2023 decision that AI-generated illustrations for a graphic novel were not copyrightable, although the human-authored text of the novel and overall selection and arrangement of the images and text in the novel could be copyrighted."

                but that if it is not disclosed, and the AI-generated output cannot be separated upon request from that made by humans, then the entire work is at risk:

                "Théâtre D’opéra Spatial: A September 2023 decision that an artwork generated by AI and then modified by the applicant could not be copyrighted, since the applicant failed to identify and disclaim the AI-generated portions of the work as required by the AI
                Guidance."
                mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #22

                @linear right. One could argue that the codebase ca. 2019 is likely untainted, and use that as measuring stick for what changed.

                The other thing is that you can of course mix uncopyrightable PD stuff into a larger work, if your own stuff is copyrightable. That ofc only works if the former is indeed PD and not encumbered with the rights of the stolen works’ creatives.

                linear@nya.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org

                  @linear right. One could argue that the codebase ca. 2019 is likely untainted, and use that as measuring stick for what changed.

                  The other thing is that you can of course mix uncopyrightable PD stuff into a larger work, if your own stuff is copyrightable. That ofc only works if the former is indeed PD and not encumbered with the rights of the stolen works’ creatives.

                  linear@nya.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                  linear@nya.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                  linear@nya.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #23
                  @mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org yeah. in this case i think it primarily raises concerns for future contributions. one wonders if a judge might, if reviewing this, rule that all contributions after this commit are public domain, unless the provenance of the code is very clear, e.g. patchsets taken from other projects which do practice due diligence
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                    With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

                    "Bug 2011195 - When an agent commits, don't add itself as author"

                    https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/71cc24b6a400dbd434e4df37087960d94b764791

                    I don't think it's a good thing that Mozilla seem to be explicitly encouraging unattributed LLM code in Firefox.

                    spacewizard@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                    spacewizard@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                    spacewizard@mas.to
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #24

                    @sarahjamielewis If Firefox hadn't already driven me away for good I'd be very upset

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                      With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

                      "Bug 2011195 - When an agent commits, don't add itself as author"

                      https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/71cc24b6a400dbd434e4df37087960d94b764791

                      I don't think it's a good thing that Mozilla seem to be explicitly encouraging unattributed LLM code in Firefox.

                      richardisaguyyyy@ursal.zoneR This user is from outside of this forum
                      richardisaguyyyy@ursal.zoneR This user is from outside of this forum
                      richardisaguyyyy@ursal.zone
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #25

                      @sarahjamielewis There isn't much to think about this, this is objectively not good

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                        With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

                        "Bug 2011195 - When an agent commits, don't add itself as author"

                        https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/71cc24b6a400dbd434e4df37087960d94b764791

                        I don't think it's a good thing that Mozilla seem to be explicitly encouraging unattributed LLM code in Firefox.

                        brianrepko@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                        brianrepko@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                        brianrepko@hachyderm.io
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #26

                        @sarahjamielewis the “ai agent” cannot own the copyright on the code it produces so that might be one reason not to add anything to the author list - that said any code produced needs to be identified as you might have to check if it was copied from any training code (and the license requirements of that code). pyOpenSci and rOpenSci just wrote up new policies on this.

                        basxto@chaos.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jbowen@mast.hpc.socialJ jbowen@mast.hpc.social

                          @sarahjamielewis
                          Yet another reason to abandon Firefox and Mozilla in general.

                          Edit: Use NetSurf or Lynx. Or just curl or wget.

                          skymtf@blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                          skymtf@blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                          skymtf@blahaj.zone
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #27

                          @jbowen@mast.hpc.social @sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social we need a new browser, its kinda ovbious, both the major browsers are horrible companies now. We need a new browser, we need it to be big, and paid devs to work on it. Volenteer based projects are cool, but there needs to be money behind if

                          wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW jbowen@mast.hpc.socialJ gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                            With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

                            "Bug 2011195 - When an agent commits, don't add itself as author"

                            https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/71cc24b6a400dbd434e4df37087960d94b764791

                            I don't think it's a good thing that Mozilla seem to be explicitly encouraging unattributed LLM code in Firefox.

                            yon@sakurajima.moeY This user is from outside of this forum
                            yon@sakurajima.moeY This user is from outside of this forum
                            yon@sakurajima.moe
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #28

                            @sarahjamielewis Closed source who cares. But with open source if there’s a massive successful lawsuit due to the endless stealing of training material every piece of code produced from that training set is tainted.

                            That’s something that should make open source reject all this, as a very big risk that’s not worth it.

                            Imho.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • skymtf@blahaj.zoneS skymtf@blahaj.zone

                              @jbowen@mast.hpc.social @sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social we need a new browser, its kinda ovbious, both the major browsers are horrible companies now. We need a new browser, we need it to be big, and paid devs to work on it. Volenteer based projects are cool, but there needs to be money behind if

                              wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wombatpandaa@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #29

                              @skymtf @sarahjamielewis @jbowen I'm personally hoping that Orion by the Kagi devs will be good. I've been pleased with their search so far.

                              pip@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW wombatpandaa@mastodon.social

                                @skymtf @sarahjamielewis @jbowen I'm personally hoping that Orion by the Kagi devs will be good. I've been pleased with their search so far.

                                pip@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pip@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pip@infosec.exchange
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #30

                                @wombatpandaa @skymtf @sarahjamielewis @jbowen

                                Kagi is hot garbage, sorry to say.

                                They're also wasting tons of resources developing AI slop, and don't understand basic privacy concepts either:

                                https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

                                wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                                  With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

                                  "Bug 2011195 - When an agent commits, don't add itself as author"

                                  https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/71cc24b6a400dbd434e4df37087960d94b764791

                                  I don't think it's a good thing that Mozilla seem to be explicitly encouraging unattributed LLM code in Firefox.

                                  zaki@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  zaki@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  zaki@plasmatrap.com
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #31

                                  @sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social the fact that theyre actively trying to hide this shit genuinely just disappoints me

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                                    With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

                                    "Bug 2011195 - When an agent commits, don't add itself as author"

                                    https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/71cc24b6a400dbd434e4df37087960d94b764791

                                    I don't think it's a good thing that Mozilla seem to be explicitly encouraging unattributed LLM code in Firefox.

                                    spherulitic@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    spherulitic@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    spherulitic@tech.lgbt
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #32

                                    @sarahjamielewis if nothing else this is legally dubious. AI authored content is uncopyrightable so all LLM written code is public domain.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pip@infosec.exchangeP pip@infosec.exchange

                                      @wombatpandaa @skymtf @sarahjamielewis @jbowen

                                      Kagi is hot garbage, sorry to say.

                                      They're also wasting tons of resources developing AI slop, and don't understand basic privacy concepts either:

                                      https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

                                      wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wombatpandaa@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #33

                                      @pip @skymtf @sarahjamielewis @jbowen I'll admit that I don't love how much resources they're putting towards AI. I'll check out your link when I have some time, thanks!

                                      jbowen@mast.hpc.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                                        With all the discussion around detecting when a code repo contains commits authored by an LLM, I think it is important to note commits like the following in Mozilla Firefox from 2 weeks ago:

                                        "Bug 2011195 - When an agent commits, don't add itself as author"

                                        https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/71cc24b6a400dbd434e4df37087960d94b764791

                                        I don't think it's a good thing that Mozilla seem to be explicitly encouraging unattributed LLM code in Firefox.

                                        li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        li@tech.lgbt
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #34

                                        @sarahjamielewis im not sure this would evade detection since theres a .claude/settings.json file now explicilty telling it to do this ..

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW wombatpandaa@mastodon.social

                                          @pip @skymtf @sarahjamielewis @jbowen I'll admit that I don't love how much resources they're putting towards AI. I'll check out your link when I have some time, thanks!

                                          jbowen@mast.hpc.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jbowen@mast.hpc.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jbowen@mast.hpc.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #35

                                          @wombatpandaa @pip @skymtf @sarahjamielewis
                                          Yeah, I definitely think of Kagi as an AI slop shop first.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper