Machine speed is a con and we don't have to buy it.

[lumiworx@mastodon.social]

@mttaggart

No doubt you know this already, but it absolutely doesn't hurt to repeat it often.

You can have it fast, or it can be great, but you cant have both.

-or-

Two hands full of elephant dung is always a load of crap.

[mttaggart@infosec.exchange]

@lumiworx The good/fast/cheap triad is actually in the post

[fartnuggets@jorts.horse]

@buck @mttaggart slow is smooth, smooth is fast.

[julie@merida.hair]

@mttaggart@infosec.exchange I want so badly for you to sit down with my CIO and explain this to him, but he got too much marketing at Fal.con.

[mttaggart@infosec.exchange]

@julie Woof, he's not the only one

[inw@mastodon.social]

@mttaggart
Thank you so much for this text. You put did a lot of things into words I was feeling or thinking.

And even better

> This is emotional labor. I don't think it's a coincidence that the overwhelmingly male tech industry has deemed this the work to surrender to machines.

This gave me another perspective and angle to consider.

[mttaggart@infosec.exchange]

@inw You're welcome! Glad you enjoyed it.

[sten@chaos.social]

@mttaggart Thanks for this, this is very good.

[mttaggart@infosec.exchange]

@sten Thank you, Stephan! I'm glad you enjoyed it.

[innerand@23.social]

@mttaggart
The security dilemma also applies to economics. If your competitors use LLMs to generate cheap software you also have to use them or they will push you out of the market.