Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. A point most authors studiously ignore is that the real world is *complex*.

A point most authors studiously ignore is that the real world is *complex*.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
78 Indlæg 40 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    @junklight My *first* space opera books had >1 govt/planet. And as Rachel Mansour said in "Iron Sunrise", "when I visit a world with a single planetary government, I start looking for the mass graves in the empty patches on the map."

    N This user is from outside of this forum
    N This user is from outside of this forum
    ndonegan@mastodon.ie
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #45

    @cstross @junklight Would that be a function of how long a planet might be colonised? Early on in the process, it's very likely to be a single government, but as it grows there's room for more diversity?

    cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

      PS: I'm not making this up. More about the US Intelligence Community here:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community

      "The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole would include 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances."

      neurobashing@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      neurobashing@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      neurobashing@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #46

      @cstross i live in Northern Virginia. I bought my house from a *couple* that worked for the CIA (they had a pic w/ Leon Panetta on the wall when we first looked at it). My next door neighbor worked for the NRO. So many people I know hold cleared-but-otherwise-normal jobs. It's a strange place

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N ndonegan@mastodon.ie

        @cstross @junklight Would that be a function of how long a planet might be colonised? Early on in the process, it's very likely to be a single government, but as it grows there's room for more diversity?

        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstross@wandering.shop
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #47

        @ndonegan @junklight Nope, not in that setting.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

          PS: I'm not making this up. More about the US Intelligence Community here:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community

          "The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole would include 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances."

          majohashi@mastodon.greenM This user is from outside of this forum
          majohashi@mastodon.greenM This user is from outside of this forum
          majohashi@mastodon.green
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #48

          @cstross
          The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the REDACTED?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

            RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117110021420097079

            A point most authors studiously ignore is that the real world is *complex*.

            Take spy thrillers. An American one might feature the CIA or, in extremis, the NSA. Up against one rival agency.

            But in reality, there's a civil service clearinghouse called the United States Intelligence Community that has nineteen stakeholder members, each of which is an intel agency. Its job is to keep them from stomping on each other's toes.

            Now ask yourself if any other nation's bureaucracy is plausibly simpler.

            jollysea@chaos.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jollysea@chaos.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jollysea@chaos.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #49

            @cstross just yesterday I calculated that since the first intelligence agency was set up, the US creates a new one every 8,2 years.

            (I do, however, think that the US is a bit of an outlier here. Still good advise in general!)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117110021420097079

              A point most authors studiously ignore is that the real world is *complex*.

              Take spy thrillers. An American one might feature the CIA or, in extremis, the NSA. Up against one rival agency.

              But in reality, there's a civil service clearinghouse called the United States Intelligence Community that has nineteen stakeholder members, each of which is an intel agency. Its job is to keep them from stomping on each other's toes.

              Now ask yourself if any other nation's bureaucracy is plausibly simpler.

              venya@musicians.todayV This user is from outside of this forum
              venya@musicians.todayV This user is from outside of this forum
              venya@musicians.today
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #50

              @cstross

              Once upon a time I was in the middle east responsible for all of a specific type of activity conducted by the combined joint special operations task force. In the 9th month of our deployment, preparing to head home, I was still learning of the EXISTENCE of teams below me doing that activity; I'd no notion of WHAT they were doing, except that I knew beyond doubt that it wasn't being done right because it would've had to come through me.

              Whole system is broke.

              tarbh@mastodon.ieT roseraven@eldritch.cafeR 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117110021420097079

                A point most authors studiously ignore is that the real world is *complex*.

                Take spy thrillers. An American one might feature the CIA or, in extremis, the NSA. Up against one rival agency.

                But in reality, there's a civil service clearinghouse called the United States Intelligence Community that has nineteen stakeholder members, each of which is an intel agency. Its job is to keep them from stomping on each other's toes.

                Now ask yourself if any other nation's bureaucracy is plausibly simpler.

                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                isol@mastodon.au
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #51

                @cstross

                From Frank Herbert's novels:

                "The protagonist of "The Tactful Saboteur" is saboteur extraordinary Jorj X. McKie, an employee of the Bureau of Sabotage (BuSab). BuSab is a government agency responsible for conducting dirty tricks "in lieu of red tape" to help slow down and regulate the vast galaxy-spanning bureaucracy of the ConSentiency"

                robotistry@fediscience.orgR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • junklight@mastodon.artJ junklight@mastodon.art

                  @cstross maybe there is a reason a lot of scifi lazily has one government per planet 😉

                  This has actually bothered me in the past - like how come everyone on the planet all suddenly agree with each other? haven't you ever been in a room full of people?

                  🙂

                  venya@musicians.todayV This user is from outside of this forum
                  venya@musicians.todayV This user is from outside of this forum
                  venya@musicians.today
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #52

                  @junklight

                  @cstross

                  The REALLY lazy planets have one climate (*cough* Tattooine, Endor, etc.)

                  I always wanted to parody this by writing settings where you would go to the circus planet, the concert planet, the grocery shopping planet, etc.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117110021420097079

                    A point most authors studiously ignore is that the real world is *complex*.

                    Take spy thrillers. An American one might feature the CIA or, in extremis, the NSA. Up against one rival agency.

                    But in reality, there's a civil service clearinghouse called the United States Intelligence Community that has nineteen stakeholder members, each of which is an intel agency. Its job is to keep them from stomping on each other's toes.

                    Now ask yourself if any other nation's bureaucracy is plausibly simpler.

                    majohashi@mastodon.greenM This user is from outside of this forum
                    majohashi@mastodon.greenM This user is from outside of this forum
                    majohashi@mastodon.green
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #53

                    @cstross

                    https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/kex3d9/collapse_book_club_discussion_of_immoderate/

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dereisenhofer@metalhead.clubD dereisenhofer@metalhead.club

                      @cstross That's a good one. Pretty much describes my impression.

                      jannem@fosstodon.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jannem@fosstodon.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jannem@fosstodon.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #54

                      @dereisenhofer @cstross
                      Or the classic "desert planet". As if anything planet-sized and and not frozen solid will have a uniform climate.

                      dereisenhofer@metalhead.clubD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • davidtheeviloverlord@mastodon.socialD davidtheeviloverlord@mastodon.social

                        @cstross

                        I remember an episode of Get Smart where he went undercover. At the end of the episode, he discovered that every one of the bad guys was an undercover agent, all from different agencies, and nobody knew they were all gathering intel on each other.

                        kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kats@chaosfem.tw
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #55

                        @davidtheeviloverlord @cstross Now I need to watch Cypher again.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                          PS: I'm not making this up. More about the US Intelligence Community here:

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community

                          "The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole would include 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances."

                          kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kats@chaosfem.tw
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #56

                          @cstross ...and I thought Trevanian was exaggerating for effect in The Eiger Sanction, about CII being named for the 102 agencies that had been merged to create it.

                          cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jannem@fosstodon.orgJ jannem@fosstodon.org

                            @cstross
                            Never mind all non-governmental organizations big enough to need/want their own security or intelligence apparatuses. Apparatii?

                            Huge multinationals; drug cartels; resistance movements ...

                            somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #57

                            @jannem @cstross Disney

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • kats@chaosfem.twK kats@chaosfem.tw

                              @cstross ...and I thought Trevanian was exaggerating for effect in The Eiger Sanction, about CII being named for the 102 agencies that had been merged to create it.

                              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstross@wandering.shop
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #58

                              @KatS It's a very long time since I read Trevanian but their fic had a certain feel of truthiness about the angle it approached intelligence from that makes me think they were once an insider, or insider-adjacent.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jannem@fosstodon.orgJ jannem@fosstodon.org

                                @dereisenhofer @cstross
                                Or the classic "desert planet". As if anything planet-sized and and not frozen solid will have a uniform climate.

                                dereisenhofer@metalhead.clubD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dereisenhofer@metalhead.clubD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dereisenhofer@metalhead.club
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #59

                                @jannem The wild west planet where everybody lives on a farm. The ice planet, the crystal planet, etc. etm. @cstross

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • venya@musicians.todayV venya@musicians.today

                                  @cstross

                                  Once upon a time I was in the middle east responsible for all of a specific type of activity conducted by the combined joint special operations task force. In the 9th month of our deployment, preparing to head home, I was still learning of the EXISTENCE of teams below me doing that activity; I'd no notion of WHAT they were doing, except that I knew beyond doubt that it wasn't being done right because it would've had to come through me.

                                  Whole system is broke.

                                  tarbh@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tarbh@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tarbh@mastodon.ie
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #60

                                  @venya @cstross Would Task #1 on Day #1 not have been "Give me an org chart covering all of the teams I'm responsible for!"

                                  cstross@wandering.shopC venya@musicians.todayV robotistry@fediscience.orgR 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tarbh@mastodon.ieT tarbh@mastodon.ie

                                    @venya @cstross Would Task #1 on Day #1 not have been "Give me an org chart covering all of the teams I'm responsible for!"

                                    cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cstross@wandering.shop
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #61

                                    @Tarbh @venya I'm sorry but half the boxes on the org chart are labelled [CLASSIFIED]. And the org chart itself is [CLASSIFIED] above your level.

                                    Srsly, I've heard anecdotes about folks tasked with writing reports that were then classified so high they weren't allowed to read them—or then to amend them where found to be factually incorrect.

                                    venya@musicians.todayV jimfl@hachyderm.ioJ 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • tarbh@mastodon.ieT tarbh@mastodon.ie

                                      @venya @cstross Would Task #1 on Day #1 not have been "Give me an org chart covering all of the teams I'm responsible for!"

                                      venya@musicians.todayV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      venya@musicians.todayV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      venya@musicians.today
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #62

                                      @Tarbh

                                      @cstross

                                      The unspoken implication here is that ANYONE knew. The people we took over from certainly didn't.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                        @Tarbh @venya I'm sorry but half the boxes on the org chart are labelled [CLASSIFIED]. And the org chart itself is [CLASSIFIED] above your level.

                                        Srsly, I've heard anecdotes about folks tasked with writing reports that were then classified so high they weren't allowed to read them—or then to amend them where found to be factually incorrect.

                                        venya@musicians.todayV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        venya@musicians.todayV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        venya@musicians.today
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #63

                                        @cstross

                                        @Tarbh

                                        Aside from clearance, there is also need-to-know. I frequently encountered situations toward the end of my career when I would try to refer someone to something I'd written years before in a different role that I myself no longer had access to.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                          Now, I'm currently grappling with a space opera set in a mid-sized interstellar empire governed by backbiting aristocrats/planetary despots, with 8000 star systems, multiple settled worlds/habitats per system, and travel times measured in weeks to months. Multiple governments per planet aren't unusual.

                                          How many intel/secret police forces do you think *that* setting requires? Just saying "it's an empire, duh!" elides all the complexity a glance at the history of John Company would reveal.

                                          haihappen@social.anoxinon.deH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          haihappen@social.anoxinon.deH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          haihappen@social.anoxinon.de
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #64

                                          @cstross some guesstimation puts the number of people employed in "Intelligence" in the USA north of 1.5 mil people, potentially way bigger.
                                          So I would put the ballpark ratio for a somewhat fascist empire at 1:100 people work on INT. If there are fewer external threats, more will be looking inward. Spanish inquisitions hunting the Spanglish Inquisition which was set up as a sting operation by another department of the SI...

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper