Rust wgpu now has a
-
@mcc I didn't quite follow the whole thread, but I think it's worth clarifying that wgpu is only used in Servo to implement webgpu, which is an optional feature. Servo rests atop webrender instead.
@jdm_ that's very good to know, however, all the rust software *I* wrote in the last four or so years was written atop wgpu, and this was the entirety of my plan for running my software inside servo, if my wacky "ChromeOS but Servo" idea came to fruition
-
@jdm_ that's very good to know, however, all the rust software *I* wrote in the last four or so years was written atop wgpu, and this was the entirety of my plan for running my software inside servo, if my wacky "ChromeOS but Servo" idea came to fruition
@mcc Ah, yeah, That would be a sticking point
-
@ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @decay @amarioguy the frustrating thing is, (as we were briefly privately discussing), at some point they did!
and then they (possibly a different group of "they"?) decided to change their minds
@r @ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @amarioguy the capitalist class successfully broke the strong labor and revolutionary socialist movements that they were bulwarking against in the first place and had no more reason not to tighten the noose, same as the collapse of the welfare state, same as why public healthcare is being dismantled outside the US and so on
-
@r @ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @amarioguy the capitalist class successfully broke the strong labor and revolutionary socialist movements that they were bulwarking against in the first place and had no more reason not to tighten the noose, same as the collapse of the welfare state, same as why public healthcare is being dismantled outside the US and so on
@decay @r @MaddieM4 @mcc @amarioguy with that said, though, there is an awful lot of educated, pro-labor, pro-positive-change community in existence right this moment. the factors that gave rise to it may be gone, we can't count on such a thing being around forever, but we as people still exist, in this moment.
-
@ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @decay @amarioguy on this note, it's an absolute shame that "pre-calculus" in the USA K-12 "traditional" math pathway is such a poorly-implemented clusterfuck
for those not familiar, as far as i can tell, this was *supposed to be* a wrap-up of elementary algebra and *the bridge* into the "real math" mode of thinking (i.e. the "correct" blend of formalisms, beauty, discovery, abstractions, etc. that mathematicians actually use)
instead, it typically turns into a poorly-motivated grab-bag of topics that aren't clearly "calculus" but that they couldn't fit anywhere else
a bunch of the "i wish i knew the math needed to do X" i've seen where X is something computer+art-ish doesn't actually require much beyond this (okay, probably some extra discrete math bits because the USA curriculum just refuses to add any of that)
@r @ireneista @mcc @decay @amarioguy You just gave me flashbacks to being extremely bitter and feeling helpless in precalc, because I actually knew calculus! I learned it for game engine stuff, because I wanted to make games! Failing precalc while knowing calculus feels so so bad and makes you wonder how you could be this kind of broken.
-
@r @ireneista @mcc @decay @amarioguy You just gave me flashbacks to being extremely bitter and feeling helpless in precalc, because I actually knew calculus! I learned it for game engine stuff, because I wanted to make games! Failing precalc while knowing calculus feels so so bad and makes you wonder how you could be this kind of broken.
@MaddieM4 @r @mcc @decay @amarioguy it's the schools to blame, and the policymakers who decided it should be that way. it was never your fault.
-
@mcc @MaddieM4 The original SPIR was a fork of LLVM IR. SPIR-V is more or less "GLSL encoded as an SSA-based VM bytecode". @decay @riley @ireneista @amarioguy
@mcc @MaddieM4 @ireneista This was done for a couple reasons. One is that LLVM IR is not actually a stable target, it is ultimately an implementation detail of LLVM and changes as LLVM changes so you have to follow upstream LLVM or maintain your ancient version forever. Which is not desirable in a standard interchange format. The other is that LLVM isn't really a good fit for GPU code for a number of reasons, and was even less of a good fit at the time.
-
@MaddieM4 @r @mcc @decay @amarioguy it's the schools to blame, and the policymakers who decided it should be that way. it was never your fault.
@ireneista @r @mcc @decay @amarioguy thank you, really. I did get there on my own in the end, but I wish so badly I could tell that to teenage Maddie. Among other sage advice that would have saved me a lot of heartache.
-
@ireneista @r @mcc @decay @amarioguy thank you, really. I did get there on my own in the end, but I wish so badly I could tell that to teenage Maddie. Among other sage advice that would have saved me a lot of heartache.
@MaddieM4 @r @mcc @decay @amarioguy for sure.
-
@ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @decay @amarioguy on this note, it's an absolute shame that "pre-calculus" in the USA K-12 "traditional" math pathway is such a poorly-implemented clusterfuck
for those not familiar, as far as i can tell, this was *supposed to be* a wrap-up of elementary algebra and *the bridge* into the "real math" mode of thinking (i.e. the "correct" blend of formalisms, beauty, discovery, abstractions, etc. that mathematicians actually use)
instead, it typically turns into a poorly-motivated grab-bag of topics that aren't clearly "calculus" but that they couldn't fit anywhere else
a bunch of the "i wish i knew the math needed to do X" i've seen where X is something computer+art-ish doesn't actually require much beyond this (okay, probably some extra discrete math bits because the USA curriculum just refuses to add any of that)
@r @ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @decay @amarioguy
yeah, i ended up having a lot of pre-calc students drop into tutoring hours in college, and i could see how it was stuff you needed to know for calculus (maybe they did a bit better job of that),
but a lot of students were just taking it as a sole math requirement, the last math class they'll ever take, either because they didn't place into calculus or didn't want to take calculus ... and it really was not a good fit for that purpose. i felt sorry for those students.
-
@r @ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @decay @amarioguy
yeah, i ended up having a lot of pre-calc students drop into tutoring hours in college, and i could see how it was stuff you needed to know for calculus (maybe they did a bit better job of that),
but a lot of students were just taking it as a sole math requirement, the last math class they'll ever take, either because they didn't place into calculus or didn't want to take calculus ... and it really was not a good fit for that purpose. i felt sorry for those students.
@monoidmusician @ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @decay @amarioguy i... outright forgor that college-level precalculus even exists. that sounds like it'd be an *even bigger* design-by-committee too-many-competing-interests clusterfuck
bit of a self-dox, but somebody really should replace it with a "The Beauty and Joy of Mathematics"
-
@amarioguy @MaddieM4 @ireneista @mcc @decay ... did i just accidentally stumble into a much bigger problem/rabbit-hole than i expected?
-
@amarioguy @MaddieM4 @ireneista @mcc @decay ... did i just accidentally stumble into a much bigger problem/rabbit-hole than i expected?
@amarioguy @MaddieM4 @ireneista @mcc @decay istg *every* time the american traditional math pathway has a jump in abstractness and/or complexity, some portion of students get traumatized for life and give up on math forever
there's the well-known tropes of "fractions" ("pieces of a whole" and "ratios" --> division as a general operation), "negatives" (inverse operations), and "algebra" (symbols)
but i didn't realize this *continued*
-
@monoidmusician @ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @decay @amarioguy i... outright forgor that college-level precalculus even exists. that sounds like it'd be an *even bigger* design-by-committee too-many-competing-interests clusterfuck
bit of a self-dox, but somebody really should replace it with a "The Beauty and Joy of Mathematics"
yeah, I could imagine it's like that at other places. I went to a small liberal arts college (Bard College), and professors were given a lot of latitude and trust to teach even core courses their way, I think, even if general requirements are agreed upon.
there are some interesting courses for non-majors. I can find “Mathematics and Politics” and “Games of Chance” listed. Lauren Rose focuses on games/puzzles, stuff like Rubiks cubes and Set and generalizations.
sometimes the courses for non-majors are one-offs. I think there was a more conceptual course taught one semester, focusing on the larger picture like what are proofs and why do we care. I don't know any details or how it did.
but I agree. The Beauty and Joy of Mathematics needs to be a standard course
-
yeah, I could imagine it's like that at other places. I went to a small liberal arts college (Bard College), and professors were given a lot of latitude and trust to teach even core courses their way, I think, even if general requirements are agreed upon.
there are some interesting courses for non-majors. I can find “Mathematics and Politics” and “Games of Chance” listed. Lauren Rose focuses on games/puzzles, stuff like Rubiks cubes and Set and generalizations.
sometimes the courses for non-majors are one-offs. I think there was a more conceptual course taught one semester, focusing on the larger picture like what are proofs and why do we care. I don't know any details or how it did.
but I agree. The Beauty and Joy of Mathematics needs to be a standard course
@monoidmusician @ireneista @MaddieM4 oooh, those all sound like pretty fun ideas
but yeah, this ought to be gathered into something repeatable
i wonder if there's a particular reason why the US doesn't really like to introduce discrete mathematics? (is this part of the same cold war math push that gave us much of the rest?)
since that's a *major* feature of recreational mathematics, puzzles and games, *and computing*
-
@monoidmusician @ireneista @MaddieM4 oooh, those all sound like pretty fun ideas
but yeah, this ought to be gathered into something repeatable
i wonder if there's a particular reason why the US doesn't really like to introduce discrete mathematics? (is this part of the same cold war math push that gave us much of the rest?)
since that's a *major* feature of recreational mathematics, puzzles and games, *and computing*
discrete math was taught in the CS department, by the professor who also taught Haskell lol. (he, uh, wasn't a great teacher. didn't really meet the students where they were at or check that they really understood. yay for perpetuating Haskell's elitist reputation...)
but i'm not sure, i don't know the history of why discrete math is so rare. it's not exactly rare in pure math research either, is it? but it probably gets less attention on its own, and its biggest success, graph theory, is seen as its own thing.
i made a language based on hereditarily finite sets, for if i ever feel the need to explain set theory again haha
-
@ireneista @MaddieM4 @mcc @decay @amarioguy on this note, it's an absolute shame that "pre-calculus" in the USA K-12 "traditional" math pathway is such a poorly-implemented clusterfuck
for those not familiar, as far as i can tell, this was *supposed to be* a wrap-up of elementary algebra and *the bridge* into the "real math" mode of thinking (i.e. the "correct" blend of formalisms, beauty, discovery, abstractions, etc. that mathematicians actually use)
instead, it typically turns into a poorly-motivated grab-bag of topics that aren't clearly "calculus" but that they couldn't fit anywhere else
a bunch of the "i wish i knew the math needed to do X" i've seen where X is something computer+art-ish doesn't actually require much beyond this (okay, probably some extra discrete math bits because the USA curriculum just refuses to add any of that)
@r i thought it's like algebra 3 -
@r i thought it's like algebra 3
@nyanpasu64 it is, except that the US split of "algebra 1" and "algebra 2" is itself a weird americanism and arguably not that well-motivated either
-
@nyanpasu64 it is, except that the US split of "algebra 1" and "algebra 2" is itself a weird americanism and arguably not that well-motivated either
@r what alternative organization/progression of topics would make more sense to you? -
@r what alternative organization/progression of topics would make more sense to you?
@nyanpasu64 i mean, i'm not a policymaker, so i can just make up whatever i want, right?
* push basic single-variable equations throughout the integrated pre-middle-school curriculum. use empty boxes or something if "x" looks too scary (e.g. the UK does this)
* put all of elementary algebra involving polynomials, up to the fundamental theorem of algebra into just a single "algebra"
* make sure "euclidean geometry" is *actually* doing proofs and formalisms and the "real math" way of thinking. maybe throw some more discrete math ideas into here too, and spend less time on specific well-known euclidean geometry theorems (i certainly don't remember many of them)
* make trigonometry and all the haphazardly scattered bits of analytic geometry be its own actual thing. maybe even combine it with drafting (very oldschool), CAD, and/or gamedev
* "just" shove pre-calculus into either algebra or calculus
* do Something
️ more coherent with statistics (i'm not very experienced here, "probability and random processes" is somehow totally-different-yet-the-same in a way that doesn't actually transfer over)* maybe offer linear algebra for the tryhards
* Somehow
️ fit in a "how to _actually_ use computers (mostly for math)" thing? (spreadsheets, computer algebra systems, UI automation?, the rest of the "the difference in gen Z computer literacy is whether they had to install minecraft mods before the modern launchers" computer skills)
