Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. AI agents are programs that use your logins to do things.

AI agents are programs that use your logins to do things.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
20 Indlæg 14 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • aredridel@kolektiva.socialA aredridel@kolektiva.social

    @futurebird The way they're usually integrated, you run an instance of a service that has the passwords, all in one place, and not ... entirely ... under the control of anyone but you. (It's more complicated than absolute).

    Having a single place it all lives makes it relatively easy to maintain.

    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.win
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #8

    @aredridel

    Everything was in one place with IFTTT too?

    aredridel@kolektiva.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      IFTTT wasn't a terrible idea. "turn off the lights when I'm more than 1 mile from home" isn't a bad automation. But #IFTTT failed, mostly because it just didn't work reliably. Coordinating the logins and apps was difficult. If you changed a password everything would break.

      Why is it better to have an #LLM generate IFTTT task for you? I'm not just asking to be mean I really want to know.

      We've done this. What did we learn from IFTTT?

      futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
      futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
      futurebird@sauropods.win
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #9

      https://ifttt.com/

      It's still around I see. I wonder who is still using it?

      brunox@mastodon.uyB josh0@babka.socialJ majorlinux@toot.majorshouse.comM paul@oldfriends.liveP 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        https://ifttt.com/

        It's still around I see. I wonder who is still using it?

        brunox@mastodon.uyB This user is from outside of this forum
        brunox@mastodon.uyB This user is from outside of this forum
        brunox@mastodon.uy
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #10

        @futurebird I know people who still use it. Mostly tiny automations and not something IoT-esque like turning lights off but kinda like sending a notices if some web changes or something.

        angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          @aredridel

          Everything was in one place with IFTTT too?

          aredridel@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          aredridel@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          aredridel@kolektiva.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #11

          @futurebird Yeah, but it did so little that at least when I used it, there was always somewhere else.

          aredridel@kolektiva.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

            https://ifttt.com/

            It's still around I see. I wonder who is still using it?

            josh0@babka.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            josh0@babka.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            josh0@babka.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #12

            @futurebird I actually have one automation set up for it. It monitors an RSS feed, and then sends a slack message if there’s a post meeting certain conditions. Very simple and effective, and fits into their free usage tier.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

              AI agents are programs that use your logins to do things. For example and AI agent might notice your bank balence is low due to all your polymarket gambling and sign you up for a $890 "financial literacy bootcamp" and send your spouse a text telling them to check in on you. It's the future. But hold on. We've seen this before.

              Remember IFTTT?
              It also used your logins to do things, but you had to write the programs yourself. I used it to make my lights flash red whenever congress passed a bill.

              riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
              riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
              riley@toot.cat
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #13

              @futurebird Can I rant about the "primitive AI" topic of AI agents being individual members of a botswarm?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • aredridel@kolektiva.socialA aredridel@kolektiva.social

                @futurebird Yeah, but it did so little that at least when I used it, there was always somewhere else.

                aredridel@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                aredridel@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                aredridel@kolektiva.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #14

                @futurebird Also my system specifically (I don't run any such thing), I could just plunk the tools down next to home assistant on the same machine and have no passwords involved at all. And it could talk to my network too. No passwords, just local control.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                  IFTTT wasn't a terrible idea. "turn off the lights when I'm more than 1 mile from home" isn't a bad automation. But #IFTTT failed, mostly because it just didn't work reliably. Coordinating the logins and apps was difficult. If you changed a password everything would break.

                  Why is it better to have an #LLM generate IFTTT task for you? I'm not just asking to be mean I really want to know.

                  We've done this. What did we learn from IFTTT?

                  perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                  perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                  perigee@rage.love
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #15

                  @futurebird I don't think there's anything mean about querying the purpose of inaccurate tools used primarily for convenience.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                    https://ifttt.com/

                    It's still around I see. I wonder who is still using it?

                    majorlinux@toot.majorshouse.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                    majorlinux@toot.majorshouse.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                    majorlinux@toot.majorshouse.com
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #16

                    @futurebird I still use it with regularity!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • brunox@mastodon.uyB brunox@mastodon.uy

                      @futurebird I know people who still use it. Mostly tiny automations and not something IoT-esque like turning lights off but kinda like sending a notices if some web changes or something.

                      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                      angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #17

                      @brunox @futurebird

                      IIRC people who used IFTTT for post propagation from one service to another usually caught blocks from those who didn't know/didn't trust it. Wonder if that is still a thing.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                        https://ifttt.com/

                        It's still around I see. I wonder who is still using it?

                        paul@oldfriends.liveP This user is from outside of this forum
                        paul@oldfriends.liveP This user is from outside of this forum
                        paul@oldfriends.live
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #18

                        @futurebird There's a lot of people that still use IFTTT in the self-host home automation circle.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                          AI agents are programs that use your logins to do things. For example and AI agent might notice your bank balence is low due to all your polymarket gambling and sign you up for a $890 "financial literacy bootcamp" and send your spouse a text telling them to check in on you. It's the future. But hold on. We've seen this before.

                          Remember IFTTT?
                          It also used your logins to do things, but you had to write the programs yourself. I used it to make my lights flash red whenever congress passed a bill.

                          paul@oldfriends.liveP This user is from outside of this forum
                          paul@oldfriends.liveP This user is from outside of this forum
                          paul@oldfriends.live
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #19

                          @futurebird No thank you. That sounds dangerous. Some people still write checks and some ATM machines, like at diners, mom and pop stores, etc, don't clear until later or the next day even. What happens when someone writes a check or does a large purchase with their ATM Debit card that doesn't clear right away, nor informs the AI control account, but AI has moved money around, esp lower income with limited income or unsophisticated AI users ticking settings and permissions they know nothing about and it's just not there to cover the charges? Bad checks charges? Theft by deception charges? Will there be an "AI caused it" defense?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                            AI agents are programs that use your logins to do things. For example and AI agent might notice your bank balence is low due to all your polymarket gambling and sign you up for a $890 "financial literacy bootcamp" and send your spouse a text telling them to check in on you. It's the future. But hold on. We've seen this before.

                            Remember IFTTT?
                            It also used your logins to do things, but you had to write the programs yourself. I used it to make my lights flash red whenever congress passed a bill.

                            cptsuperlative@toot.catC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cptsuperlative@toot.catC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cptsuperlative@toot.cat
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #20

                            @futurebird

                            It’s worse. Far worse.

                            IFTTT can’t “decide” to donate 98% of your savings to a maga pac. An agentic LLM might.

                            Oh, you set safeguards?

                            Nice, how do they work? Same way LLMs work generally. Like hiring toddlers to watch your toddlers. Except that toddlers actually comprehend.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                            Svar
                            • Svar som emne
                            Login for at svare
                            • Ældste til nyeste
                            • Nyeste til ældste
                            • Most Votes


                            • Log ind

                            • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            Graciously hosted by data.coop
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Hjem
                            • Seneste
                            • Etiketter
                            • Populære
                            • Verden
                            • Bruger
                            • Grupper