Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
evsclimatescience
9 Indlæg 9 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jcrabapple@dmv.community
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

    Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

    Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

    The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

    https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

    #EVs #Climate #Science

    rongzhou@universites.socialR andrew773@mastodon.onlineA petr90@mamutovo.czP yugthebug@mastodon.socialY crystalvisits@mas.wrong.toolsC 8 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

      🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

      Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

      Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

      The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

      https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

      #EVs #Climate #Science

      rongzhou@universites.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      rongzhou@universites.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      rongzhou@universites.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @jcrabapple Thanks for the update! Here at my faculty we have this conversation like A LOT. Would make sure to save this ref# for a future about the batteries. Would say still it's better if more people ride bicycles (zero emission vs something), but seems like EV is still making a dent!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

        🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

        Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

        Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

        The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

        https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

        #EVs #Climate #Science

        andrew773@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
        andrew773@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
        andrew773@mastodon.online
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @jcrabapple electric buses and electrified railways should come first but private EVs are better in every way than private ice vs. I call mine my Biden mobile. They were basically the cheapest new cars available for a few years during the Biden ev credit years. I believe it cost about half what the average new car costs.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

          🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

          Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

          Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

          The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

          https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

          #EVs #Climate #Science

          petr90@mamutovo.czP This user is from outside of this forum
          petr90@mamutovo.czP This user is from outside of this forum
          petr90@mamutovo.cz
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @jcrabapple 👍

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

            🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

            Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

            Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

            The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

            https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

            #EVs #Climate #Science

            yugthebug@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
            yugthebug@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
            yugthebug@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @jcrabapple
            I'm still anti ev but that's because I'm anti vehicle unless you really need it, don't buy an ev if you have a working petrol car you only occasionally use.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

              🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

              Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

              Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

              The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

              https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

              #EVs #Climate #Science

              crystalvisits@mas.wrong.toolsC This user is from outside of this forum
              crystalvisits@mas.wrong.toolsC This user is from outside of this forum
              crystalvisits@mas.wrong.tools
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @jcrabapple I wonder if US cities will start charging extra for old cars like London has. Do you know of any US cities that have proposed such changes? I have only seen items on London and UK suburbs.

              https://apnews.com/article/london-car-pollution-tax-older-politics-labour-conservatives-climate-8d8b97be250d8c18b7a0220f2dd3477b

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

                🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

                Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

                Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

                The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

                https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

                #EVs #Climate #Science

                danbrotherston@types.plD This user is from outside of this forum
                danbrotherston@types.plD This user is from outside of this forum
                danbrotherston@types.pl
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @jcrabapple I really wish our media was less complicit and more to the point.

                Headlines like:

                "These groups are lying to you to keep you dependent on expensive gas for their financial benefit"

                Should be running nation wide. If these papers worked for the people, it wouldn't even be controversial.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

                  🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

                  Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

                  Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

                  The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

                  https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

                  #EVs #Climate #Science

                  michal@sapka.plM This user is from outside of this forum
                  michal@sapka.plM This user is from outside of this forum
                  michal@sapka.pl
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8
                  In Poland, AFAIR, a car needs to drive 40-60k km/year to offset battery production.

                  My car is at 170k after 20 years 😜
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

                    🔋 MIT just published the most comprehensive EV emissions study yet, analyzing every US zip code with real driving data.

                    Battery EVs cut lifetime emissions 40-60% vs gas cars in most locations. Even on the dirtiest grid in the country, they still come out ahead. The study used DOE's GREET lifecycle model, which already includes battery manufacturing. So the "but what about making the batteries?" question is answered: building an EV produces 50-80% more CO2 upfront, but it pays that back over the vehicle's life.

                    Your driving habits matter as much as where you live. High mileage, city driving, and larger vehicles all boost the EV advantage. Cold weather cuts efficiency on a frigid night but barely dents annual savings.

                    The "who benefits from the doubt?" question has a paper trail. The API has run anti-EV messaging since 1967. Koch-funded groups planned $10M/year campaigns. AFPM dropped $10M+ on "Don't Ban Our Cars" ads in 2024 swing states.

                    https://news.mit.edu/2026/us-drivers-electric-vehicles-offer-emissions-benefits-cost-savings-0512

                    #EVs #Climate #Science

                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    paul_stilgar@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    @jcrabapple

                    Nothing replaces the test of the garage .

                    Put an ev in a closed garage , stay inside and start it .
                    Wait 10 mins
                    Put an ice car in a closed garage , stay inside and start it .
                    Wait 10 mins . Huh forget the next test.

                    #ev

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tokeriis@helvede.netT tokeriis@helvede.net shared this topic
                    Svar
                    • Svar som emne
                    Login for at svare
                    • Ældste til nyeste
                    • Nyeste til ældste
                    • Most Votes


                    • Log ind

                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                    • Login or register to search.
                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Hjem
                    • Seneste
                    • Etiketter
                    • Populære
                    • Verden
                    • Bruger
                    • Grupper