Could someone please explain to me whether Bluesky is decentralized?

[misofist@girlcock.club]

@cwebber Oooh good question! Uhhh so basically Fediverse is based on the concept of a federation, which is a form of hegemonic imperialism and therefore not decentralised.

Whereas BlueSky runs in the cloud, which is a distributed computing system and thus decentralised.

Hope this helps! Feel free to ask me if you have any more questions.

[Gæst]

@cwebber Hi Christine,

I did some digging through some back issues of CU Amiga, and I think I've figured out the answer!

It turns out, this BlueSky thing is indeed part of a decentralised network, and it's called the Internet!

Now, I know what you're thinking: What is this internet thing, and how is it different to the BBSes that I've been dialling into, using my home microcomputer?

Well, it turns out that the files on your local computer user group's BBS are typically all stored on the one computer.

But the internet is like a worldwide network of BBSes!

People are calling it an information superhighway!

You can start "surfing" from one BBS to another.

You can be in Canada and connect over the Internet to a BBS in Germany!

Is your mind blown yet?

It's compatible with all the popular microcomputers, including IBM Compatibles, Apple Macintosh, Commodore Amiga, Acorn Archimedes, and Atari ST.

Beyond viewing overseas BBSes, there's a range of fun things you can find on the web, including newsgroups, gophers, MUDs, MOOs, and electronic mail!

And now... BlueSky!

Some people say the internet won't catch on. But I saw it running on one of the Solaris workstations at a local university, and I have to say it looked pretty spiffy!

[cwebber@social.coop]

@aj this is a good answer

[Gæst]

@cwebber@social.coop I don't know if anyone's researched that question yet. You could be a pioneer if you investigate it!

[mister_shade02x2@mastodon.social]

@cwebber Not sure if this is one of those “humor” things humans sometimes do, but you don’t need blogposts to answer that question. The answer is a simple “no”.

[phillycodehound@indieweb.social]

@cwebber https://sethgoldstein.me/in-my-opinion-bluesky-will-never-federate-and-thats-concerning/

[thibaultmol@en.osm.town]

@cwebber
@niccolove 's blogpost:
https://thelibre.news/why-i-recommend-against-bluesky/

[Gæst]

@janbeta @cwebber this is completely wrong. Decentralization means mostly that the servers that contains and redirect the data of the social are phisically situated in different places. Where users are is not significant at all. Bluesky IS NOT DECENTRALIZED.

[Gæst]

@cwebber bluesky IS NOT DECENTRALIZED. And it would cost a fortune to make it so.

[Gæst]

@cwebber

I liked this answer that you received on Bluesky, which I'm duplicating in Mastodon so people don't need to go to Bluesky to find it:

https://phillipjreese.com/the-social-network-that-cant-sell-out-understanding-mastodon-vs-bluesky/

[esparta@fosstodon.org]

@cwebber

this post may help:
How Does BlueSky Work?, by @steveklabnik.com

https://steveklabnik.com/writing/how-does-bluesky-work/

> One of the reasons I am enthusiastic about BlueSky is because of the way that it works. So in this post, I am going to lay out some of the design and the principles behind this design, as I understand them. I am not on the BlueSky team, so these are my takes only.

[cwebber@social.coop]

@mister_shade02X2 thanks I don't know what a humor is either so this helps

[cwebber@social.coop]

@phillycodehound a real blogpost thank you

[cwebber@social.coop]

@thibaultmol @niccolove thank you, not only a blogpost,, but a blogpost that cites blogposts

[cwebber@social.coop]

@esparta @steveklabnik.com thank

[bri_seven@queer.party]

@cwebber you should ask that hot chick who’s working on spritely goblins

[cwebber@social.coop]

@bri_seven there might be more than one

[Gæst]

@cwebber @vmstan @lgsp i tried to make it look more modern idk if it does

https://mkljczk.pl/uploads/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/