Could someone please explain to me whether Bluesky is decentralized?

[Gæst]

@cwebber also running your own data server is a clusterfuck.

but I still did it

[Gæst]

@cwebber I just realized you wrote ActivityPub

I'm too autistic for this shit ​​

[cwebber@social.coop]

@lunareclipse In all seriousness I am glad when people have actually tried to run the infrastructure

[zalasur@mastodon.surazal.net]

@lunareclipse @cwebber I just wanted to chime in to say that at the very least it was an informative answer.

[torynski@mastodon.scot]

@cwebber from what I read it can be decentralised, in the sense that if you really try hard, you'd be able to host your own instance, but it will never be peer-to-peer, so the traffic will always go through the bluesky central hub.

I am not really a technical guy so I might misunderstood it, so I am looking forward to read the replies too.

[elplatt@greatjustice.net]

@cwebber Did they buy a bunch of centralization offsets? Maybe there's a mesh network of raspberry pis planted in a rainforest somewhere?

[Gæst]

@cwebber i found this diagram extremely intuitive, may be helpful to you as well!

[Gæst]

@cwebber IIRC it is decentralized but not as cool as to allow you to add your own instance.

[williampietri@sfba.social]

@cwebber You mean decent-ralized, like making them decent? I hear Bluesky is making use of AI moderation plus libertarian market incentives, so I'm sure they're much more decent than this place.

[elplatt@greatjustice.net]

@cwebber OK, hear me out... maybe it's controlled by a single entity, but that entity could have some kind of "offering" to sell shares of the company to the "public". Like, anyone could buy one! Then, naturally, the VCs will celebrate by purchasing billions of slices of avocado toast and lattes, and that wealth will "trickle-down" to everyone else, who will then buy their own shares. I will take my nobel prize in economics now, thank you.

[megamichelle@a2mi.social]

@cwebber

Bluesky is decentralized because it keeps all the data in de center.

[cwebber@social.coop]

@MegaMichelle blue is cold so it must help with datacenter cooling bills

[misofist@girlcock.club]

@cwebber Oooh good question! Uhhh so basically Fediverse is based on the concept of a federation, which is a form of hegemonic imperialism and therefore not decentralised.

Whereas BlueSky runs in the cloud, which is a distributed computing system and thus decentralised.

Hope this helps! Feel free to ask me if you have any more questions.

[Gæst]

@cwebber Hi Christine,

I did some digging through some back issues of CU Amiga, and I think I've figured out the answer!

It turns out, this BlueSky thing is indeed part of a decentralised network, and it's called the Internet!

Now, I know what you're thinking: What is this internet thing, and how is it different to the BBSes that I've been dialling into, using my home microcomputer?

Well, it turns out that the files on your local computer user group's BBS are typically all stored on the one computer.

But the internet is like a worldwide network of BBSes!

People are calling it an information superhighway!

You can start "surfing" from one BBS to another.

You can be in Canada and connect over the Internet to a BBS in Germany!

Is your mind blown yet?

It's compatible with all the popular microcomputers, including IBM Compatibles, Apple Macintosh, Commodore Amiga, Acorn Archimedes, and Atari ST.

Beyond viewing overseas BBSes, there's a range of fun things you can find on the web, including newsgroups, gophers, MUDs, MOOs, and electronic mail!

And now... BlueSky!

Some people say the internet won't catch on. But I saw it running on one of the Solaris workstations at a local university, and I have to say it looked pretty spiffy!

[cwebber@social.coop]

@aj this is a good answer

[Gæst]

@cwebber@social.coop I don't know if anyone's researched that question yet. You could be a pioneer if you investigate it!

[mister_shade02x2@mastodon.social]

@cwebber Not sure if this is one of those “humor” things humans sometimes do, but you don’t need blogposts to answer that question. The answer is a simple “no”.

[phillycodehound@indieweb.social]

@cwebber https://sethgoldstein.me/in-my-opinion-bluesky-will-never-federate-and-thats-concerning/

[thibaultmol@en.osm.town]

@cwebber
@niccolove 's blogpost:
https://thelibre.news/why-i-recommend-against-bluesky/

[Gæst]

@janbeta @cwebber this is completely wrong. Decentralization means mostly that the servers that contains and redirect the data of the social are phisically situated in different places. Where users are is not significant at all. Bluesky IS NOT DECENTRALIZED.