Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Anthropic got compromised.

Anthropic got compromised.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
272 Indlæg 200 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

    Anthropic themselves published the 'fixed' versions overnight on OpenVSX and VSCode Marketplace, and chose not to tell anybody what had happened.

    blueteamjk@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    blueteamjk@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    blueteamjk@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #246

    @GossiTheDog I think you should update your Medium post title, right now it's pointing fingers at parties that don't sound like they were even involved. There's a huge difference between "Cursor extension marketplace supply chain attack" and "Anthropic compromised". The scope is entirely different.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

      Updated my blog with a statement from Anthropic, they say the breach was at Cursor:

      "A malicious actor used access to Cursor’s marketplace to publish a tampered extension targeting Cursor's users, we were not involved with building, publishing, or hosting this".

      The extension in Cursor itself shows as published by Anthropic, however it looks like they are moonwalking away from that ownership now.

      suka_hiroaki@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      suka_hiroaki@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      suka_hiroaki@chaos.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #247

      @GossiTheDog Their crisis communication is getting worse by the minute. This is breathtakingly unprofessional. It's really not that hard. It's YOUR users that are getting compromised. It should be in YOUR interest to warn them asap and not shut up for hours and then say "sorry, not our fault". Their whole argument is completely missing the point

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

        @GossiTheDog Thanks for bringing attention to this, Kevin. You probably saw it, but people claiming to be from Anthropic have been commenting on the thread about this at Hacker News. e.g.

        "Dworken from Anthropic here, 2.1.313 was never published on OpenVSX, the VS Code marketplace, or on any of our official hosts. The malicious actor here had published a fake version of this extension on Cursor's marketplace. In order to disambiguate, we made sure our next update was 2.1.314."

        https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50300683

        davep@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
        davep@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
        davep@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #248

        @briankrebs @GossiTheDog

        I'd imagine it updated from a previous version rather than the Binance engineer just suddenly downloading it, so it's most likely at least a breach of their signing key, no?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

          @GossiTheDog Thanks for bringing attention to this, Kevin. You probably saw it, but people claiming to be from Anthropic have been commenting on the thread about this at Hacker News. e.g.

          "Dworken from Anthropic here, 2.1.313 was never published on OpenVSX, the VS Code marketplace, or on any of our official hosts. The malicious actor here had published a fake version of this extension on Cursor's marketplace. In order to disambiguate, we made sure our next update was 2.1.314."

          https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50300683

          fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #249

          @briankrebs @GossiTheDog I don't think you even need to be a hardened partisan in the semantic versioning wars to be alarmed at the idea of using a delta of 0.0.001 to 'disambiguate' the malicious package that somehow ended up in a trusted location from the trusted package with the identical name.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

            Cursors statements to this can basically be summed up with this GIF, everything is basically about how this is a non-issue. Just, you know, thousands of developers getting owned.

            kayohtie@blimps.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
            kayohtie@blimps.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
            kayohtie@blimps.xyz
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #250

            @GossiTheDog they're terrified about being clean for that opening bell

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

              @GossiTheDog Thanks for bringing attention to this, Kevin. You probably saw it, but people claiming to be from Anthropic have been commenting on the thread about this at Hacker News. e.g.

              "Dworken from Anthropic here, 2.1.313 was never published on OpenVSX, the VS Code marketplace, or on any of our official hosts. The malicious actor here had published a fake version of this extension on Cursor's marketplace. In order to disambiguate, we made sure our next update was 2.1.314."

              https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50300683

              wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
              wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
              wdormann@infosec.exchange
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #251

              @briankrebs @GossiTheDog
              Ah, lovely. Very important thing that is affecting a company's reputation, with customers afraid. What do we do? Have a rando user post a statement on Hacker News.

              ffforward@infosec.exchangeF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                Updated my blog with a statement from Anthropic, they say the breach was at Cursor:

                "A malicious actor used access to Cursor’s marketplace to publish a tampered extension targeting Cursor's users, we were not involved with building, publishing, or hosting this".

                The extension in Cursor itself shows as published by Anthropic, however it looks like they are moonwalking away from that ownership now.

                wronglang@bayes.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
                wronglang@bayes.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
                wronglang@bayes.club
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #252

                @GossiTheDog aren't these things signed by anthropic outside of cursor?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                  Anthropic got compromised.

                  Their Claude Code extension on Visual Studio has malware in it, which creates a remote access Trojan to desktops.

                  https://phorion.io/blog/offical-claude-code-vsx-compromise/

                  sama_rive@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sama_rive@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sama_rive@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #253

                  @GossiTheDog Terminator Bowser Dark Vador 3000 extension on Sauron has malware in it!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                    @GossiTheDog Thanks for bringing attention to this, Kevin. You probably saw it, but people claiming to be from Anthropic have been commenting on the thread about this at Hacker News. e.g.

                    "Dworken from Anthropic here, 2.1.313 was never published on OpenVSX, the VS Code marketplace, or on any of our official hosts. The malicious actor here had published a fake version of this extension on Cursor's marketplace. In order to disambiguate, we made sure our next update was 2.1.314."

                    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50300683

                    moh53n@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    moh53n@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    moh53n@hachyderm.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #254

                    @briankrebs @GossiTheDog They could end this confusion with a simple, official statement or blog post to elaborate on the scope of this, considering how concerning and vague it was.
                    Yet our best official comment is an unofficial comment on HN. Perfection.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                      @briankrebs @GossiTheDog
                      Ah, lovely. Very important thing that is affecting a company's reputation, with customers afraid. What do we do? Have a rando user post a statement on Hacker News.

                      ffforward@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                      ffforward@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                      ffforward@infosec.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #255

                      @wdormann @briankrebs @GossiTheDog It was blown to giant proportions to start with. For some reason some people that pays for the Cursor LLM harness want to use the Claude Code LLM harness inside the other LLM harness (??) from this proprietary open source mess that Musk thought was worth $60 billion. Cursor has some kind stupid proxy in front of Open VSX that they use to look like VS Code to defend their value, and this was abused to publish a fake release to a couple of thousand users. This release contains a backdoor that seems to be broken. It's literally the least important thing people need to worry about right now, so I understand that Anthropic, that literally has nothing to do with it, didn't feel any big urge to comment when Cursor already had taken 100% ownership of the compromise and issue.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                        Anthropic got compromised.

                        Their Claude Code extension on Visual Studio has malware in it, which creates a remote access Trojan to desktops.

                        https://phorion.io/blog/offical-claude-code-vsx-compromise/

                        grayrattus@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grayrattus@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grayrattus@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #256

                        @GossiTheDog XDDDD

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                          Updated my blog with a statement from Anthropic, they say the breach was at Cursor:

                          "A malicious actor used access to Cursor’s marketplace to publish a tampered extension targeting Cursor's users, we were not involved with building, publishing, or hosting this".

                          The extension in Cursor itself shows as published by Anthropic, however it looks like they are moonwalking away from that ownership now.

                          farbs@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          farbs@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          farbs@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #257

                          @GossiTheDog I still haven't managed to tease out from these statements whose security failed (other than the end users'). Were credentials stolen from Anthropic? Was there an exploit found in Cursor's upload system?

                          Both parties are rattling off lists of things that didn't go wrong, suggesting (but not stating) that they weren't at fault. But the hack didn't just magically happen without a security failure.

                          bcasiello@floss.socialB R 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                            I've confirmed Binance use Claude Code on Cursor with this extension.

                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #258

                            @GossiTheDog

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                              Cursors statements to this can basically be summed up with this GIF, everything is basically about how this is a non-issue. Just, you know, thousands of developers getting owned.

                              knapjack@social.vivaldi.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                              knapjack@social.vivaldi.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                              knapjack@social.vivaldi.net
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #259

                              @GossiTheDog It was a good drill.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                                @GossiTheDog Thanks for bringing attention to this, Kevin. You probably saw it, but people claiming to be from Anthropic have been commenting on the thread about this at Hacker News. e.g.

                                "Dworken from Anthropic here, 2.1.313 was never published on OpenVSX, the VS Code marketplace, or on any of our official hosts. The malicious actor here had published a fake version of this extension on Cursor's marketplace. In order to disambiguate, we made sure our next update was 2.1.314."

                                https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50300683

                                vonzo@toot.ioV This user is from outside of this forum
                                vonzo@toot.ioV This user is from outside of this forum
                                vonzo@toot.io
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #260

                                @briankrebs @GossiTheDog
                                I hate it when I get disambiguated
                                Grrr

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                                  To be clear this is a supply chain attack, the threat actor got reverse SSH (command line) connectivity to Anthropic customer environments at scale.

                                  lkanies@hachyderm.ioL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lkanies@hachyderm.ioL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lkanies@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #261

                                  @GossiTheDog this is my favorite thing about security - you build all these walls and defenses, then you escort the enemy through the front gates with fanfare and champagne

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                                    Anthropic got compromised.

                                    Their Claude Code extension on Visual Studio has malware in it, which creates a remote access Trojan to desktops.

                                    https://phorion.io/blog/offical-claude-code-vsx-compromise/

                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tmmike@union.place
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #262

                                    @GossiTheDog One of many exploits to be found and perhaps executed by agents, I muse.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • farbs@mastodon.socialF farbs@mastodon.social

                                      @GossiTheDog I still haven't managed to tease out from these statements whose security failed (other than the end users'). Were credentials stolen from Anthropic? Was there an exploit found in Cursor's upload system?

                                      Both parties are rattling off lists of things that didn't go wrong, suggesting (but not stating) that they weren't at fault. But the hack didn't just magically happen without a security failure.

                                      bcasiello@floss.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bcasiello@floss.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bcasiello@floss.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #263

                                      @Farbs @GossiTheDog "Ultimately it is the end-user who foolishly trusted our products and processes who must bear the brunt of the blame."

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                                        Anthropic silently removed the backdoor 7 hours ago and hasn’t disclosed a security incident.

                                        The plugin auto updates so every org will have been impacted.

                                        wowsuchcyber@cyberplace.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wowsuchcyber@cyberplace.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wowsuchcyber@cyberplace.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #264

                                        @GossiTheDog so is it this backdoor that infected binance?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • farbs@mastodon.socialF farbs@mastodon.social

                                          @GossiTheDog I still haven't managed to tease out from these statements whose security failed (other than the end users'). Were credentials stolen from Anthropic? Was there an exploit found in Cursor's upload system?

                                          Both parties are rattling off lists of things that didn't go wrong, suggesting (but not stating) that they weren't at fault. But the hack didn't just magically happen without a security failure.

                                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rdeaton@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #265

                                          @Farbs @GossiTheDog It's pretty clear what happened at this point: Cursor runs a mirror/proxy of the Open VSX marketplace. They copy in a subset of extensions, leaving the official metadata from the upstream Open VSX (which, as they are not themselves verifying the authenticity of what they're mirroring, is a wrong thing to do at this point). Their (Cursor's) mirror was breached, a version of the extension was published only on their mirror. Anthropic published a newer version on the Open VSX marketplace to make sure they don't publish a version matching the compromised version. The issue only impacted people using Cursor's mirror. The bulk of the issue going public happened in the middle of the night US Pacific time, and getting clearance to post official comms inside Anthropic took time, Cursor's statement was technically correct from the beginning and stated that their own repository had been breached and rebuilt, but a bunch of unscrupulous infosec pundits misinterpreted the post, jumped to conclusions about who was compromised, and rushed to post articles about it with information that was demonstrably false at the initial time of publication. Now everyone is more confused because a bunch of people injected useless noise into a tense situation, when the people who were impacted were being reached out to directly by the Cursor team at the time the issue was made public. No compromise of Anthropic systems or credentials happened. Cursor has not yet stated how their systems were breached, only that they were.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper