Dear Journalists,
-
Dear Journalists,
If a government official gives a statement that is easily disproven by multiple angles of high quality video, it is ok, encouraged even, to call them out on it in real time. That's called doing a journalism.
Secondly, although you all work for different media outlets, there is no reason why you can't sort of 'team up' and keep pressing the issue rather than letting them wriggle out by completely changing the line of questioning. This is also known as doing a Journalism.
Thanks!
@SecureOwl also, the fourth estate is dead and buried
-
Dear Journalists,
If a government official gives a statement that is easily disproven by multiple angles of high quality video, it is ok, encouraged even, to call them out on it in real time. That's called doing a journalism.
Secondly, although you all work for different media outlets, there is no reason why you can't sort of 'team up' and keep pressing the issue rather than letting them wriggle out by completely changing the line of questioning. This is also known as doing a Journalism.
Thanks!
@SecureOwl Lordy, We need Sam Donaldson tonight. And Dan Rather. Sigh.
-
Dear Journalists,
If a government official gives a statement that is easily disproven by multiple angles of high quality video, it is ok, encouraged even, to call them out on it in real time. That's called doing a journalism.
Secondly, although you all work for different media outlets, there is no reason why you can't sort of 'team up' and keep pressing the issue rather than letting them wriggle out by completely changing the line of questioning. This is also known as doing a Journalism.
Thanks!
but access!
-
Dear Journalists,
If a government official gives a statement that is easily disproven by multiple angles of high quality video, it is ok, encouraged even, to call them out on it in real time. That's called doing a journalism.
Secondly, although you all work for different media outlets, there is no reason why you can't sort of 'team up' and keep pressing the issue rather than letting them wriggle out by completely changing the line of questioning. This is also known as doing a Journalism.
Thanks!
never expect corporate owned media to ask the right questions. it's not in their interest & they're not smart enough.
& if it's a #Cancervative govt official, nothing they say has value anyway.
i thought only late night monologue writers & podcasters watch them now
-
Dear Journalists,
If a government official gives a statement that is easily disproven by multiple angles of high quality video, it is ok, encouraged even, to call them out on it in real time. That's called doing a journalism.
Secondly, although you all work for different media outlets, there is no reason why you can't sort of 'team up' and keep pressing the issue rather than letting them wriggle out by completely changing the line of questioning. This is also known as doing a Journalism.
Thanks!
@SecureOwl You mean the employees of media companies, owned by the same people who boldly supported political campaigns and sat behind the president at his inauguration ceremony? The employees fearing to be thrown out of the press conference each time they open their mouths and lose their jobs?
As people won't pay for independent media, they rather consume the stream of nonsense coming from billionaire owned megaphones - Critical questioning left the room, and it is not likely to return. -
Dear Journalists,
If a government official gives a statement that is easily disproven by multiple angles of high quality video, it is ok, encouraged even, to call them out on it in real time. That's called doing a journalism.
Secondly, although you all work for different media outlets, there is no reason why you can't sort of 'team up' and keep pressing the issue rather than letting them wriggle out by completely changing the line of questioning. This is also known as doing a Journalism.
Thanks!
@SecureOwl one of the astonishing things that really caught us off guard when we immigrated was the discovery that journalists outside the US do call politicians out in real time like that
we had spent our entire lives up to that point in a bubble of extreme access journalism and thought it was normal
-
@SecureOwl
Dear Mike,We checked with management and apparently they don't pay us to "do a Journalism." You must be thinking of someone else.
Regards,
Journalists@intransitivelie @SecureOwl If you’re not being paid to do a journalism, then you’re not journalists, so stop usurping the name and shut up.
-
@intransitivelie @SecureOwl If you’re not being paid to do a journalism, then you’re not journalists, so stop usurping the name and shut up.
@oscherler
You may be shocked to learn what "journalism" actually entails. Here's a hint: selling papers.I'm not trying to be nasty, but expecting journalism to stop being what it has always been and start speaking truth to power is a bit like expecting the police to stop being what they've always been and start serving and protecting.
-
Dear Journalists,
If a government official gives a statement that is easily disproven by multiple angles of high quality video, it is ok, encouraged even, to call them out on it in real time. That's called doing a journalism.
Secondly, although you all work for different media outlets, there is no reason why you can't sort of 'team up' and keep pressing the issue rather than letting them wriggle out by completely changing the line of questioning. This is also known as doing a Journalism.
Thanks!
@SecureOwl The only time I saw journalists from different media outlets team up like that was when they teamed up to pressure Joe Biden into dropping out of the 2024 election. That was not journalism.
-
@SecureOwl Lordy, We need Sam Donaldson tonight. And Dan Rather. Sigh.
@MiriShuli @SecureOwl And Jack Anderson.
-
S suneauken@mastodon.world shared this topic
