"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends. -
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.This is an excellent question. Maybe we should be contacting our MP's about this given the governments legislation is all about "saving the children"
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein *child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
Sex requires consent
Children cannot consent
Sexual imagery featuring any child is abuse material, not porn. There is no 'child porn'.I think this is important because phrases like this, and 'sex trafficking' or 'sex pest' minimise the crime and obscure perpetrators. We can and should hold media and commentators to account.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.Spot on!
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Why is *anyone* using a site that exploits women and children, contains child abuse, and is owned by a ketamine addicted nazi?
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Something for @plone to consider as well, methinks. What's the point much of having "reach" in a CSAM peddling nazi bar?
I left Twitter the moment Musk took over. At what point does reputation damage and legitimizing the fash outweigh access?
When even the FT is taking the piss out of X, you know the momentum has shifted.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Ask them because there must be answer. If there's no answer, then ask why not answer because they have to response on the question.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Dat geldt ook voor (bijvoorbeeld)de Nederlandse overheid.
-
@andrewstroehlein *child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
Sex requires consent
Children cannot consent
Sexual imagery featuring any child is abuse material, not porn. There is no 'child porn'.I think this is important because phrases like this, and 'sex trafficking' or 'sex pest' minimise the crime and obscure perpetrators. We can and should hold media and commentators to account.
@noodlemaz I call Child Sexual Abuse 'Rape'. Any touching, or grooming, or sexual act performed in front of a child, is rape. No consent = Rape. It should be obvious to the meanest intelligence. @andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Because ethics and morals don't count. Only loyalism and money.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Twitter, formally known as XXX
-
@noodlemaz I call Child Sexual Abuse 'Rape'. Any touching, or grooming, or sexual act performed in front of a child, is rape. No consent = Rape. It should be obvious to the meanest intelligence. @andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social
@Tooden that doesn't cover materials produced fearing or depicting those acts, which is why the term CSAM exists (I didn't make it up)
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein
The government's position is that while they abhor prostitution the brothel has the best piano. -
@andrewstroehlein Twitter, formally known as XXX
@andrewstroehlein *formerly, my brain is cooked right meow
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein
Jornalists insist in being there, too. This is mundo boggling. -
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.Dit zelfde geldt uiteraard ook voor de Nederlandse regering en vele anderen.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein en France c'est parce que, suite aux économies sur la santé vu comme nécessaires par de glorieux technocrates, les chiffres de la mortalité infantile ont augmenté contrairement à la majorité des autres pays européens....
C'est pas des enfants violés qui font pleurer dans les chaumières, ce sont des existences sacrifiés sur l'autel des profits et du PIB dont les médias des milliardaires respectent une sorte d'omerta.... -
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Yes but can we stop calling it that
-
@Tooden that doesn't cover materials produced fearing or depicting those acts, which is why the term CSAM exists (I didn't make it up)
@noodlemaz I didn't suggest it was. I had hoped you would see it as helpful, since the scum disseminating this material don't see it as such.
-
@andrewstroehlein Why is *anyone* using a site that exploits women and children, contains child abuse, and is owned by a ketamine addicted nazi?
@pa27 @andrewstroehlein Are we talking about X, Facebook, or one of those things Trump and his loser brigade tried to launch?
