Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The US has publicly demanded that Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours or else the US will begin destroying Iranian electricity generation.

The US has publicly demanded that Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours or else the US will begin destroying Iranian electricity generation.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
14 Indlæg 9 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH heavenlypossum@kolektiva.social

    I suppose I should be grateful to Trump for fully removing the mask and revealing the entire liberal international order was ALWAYS predicated on the formalization of state violence and state terror.

    mercurial@todon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
    mercurial@todon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
    mercurial@todon.nl
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #3

    @HeavenlyPossum yes that’s what I’m grateful for as well, but it is extremely uncomfortable, we have to bear it and then do shit about it, at least we have that opportunity

    pinkmoon@tech.lgbtP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH heavenlypossum@kolektiva.social

      The US has publicly demanded that Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours or else the US will begin destroying Iranian electricity generation.

      Under international laws of war, power plants are lawful targets insofar as they power an adversary’s war effort, and harms to civilians must be proportional to the military advantage offered by those attacks.

      In this case, threatening to destroy national power generation to coerce the Iranian state to alter its policy in the Strait is just terrorism. Not in a mere colloquial sense, but in a specifically legal sense.

      (So too is the Iranian state’s threat to retaliate in kind.)

      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/22/trump-issues-48-hour-hormuz-strait-ultimatum-threatens-iran-power-plants

      sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #4

      @HeavenlyPossum International law, like state or domestic law, only matters if it is enforced.

      viq@social.hackerspace.plV 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.socialS sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.social

        @HeavenlyPossum International law, like state or domestic law, only matters if it is enforced.

        viq@social.hackerspace.plV This user is from outside of this forum
        viq@social.hackerspace.plV This user is from outside of this forum
        viq@social.hackerspace.pl
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #5

        @SharpCheddarGoblin
        There's (at least) two kinds of "matters" in regards to law:
        - coercion of behaviours by way of consequences
        - guideline on what to strive for, and what kind of decisions to make

        I'm not able right now to put in words why having those rules in place is important even if the consequences are not there, but I do think that way.
        @HeavenlyPossum

        viq@social.hackerspace.plV 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • viq@social.hackerspace.plV viq@social.hackerspace.pl

          @SharpCheddarGoblin
          There's (at least) two kinds of "matters" in regards to law:
          - coercion of behaviours by way of consequences
          - guideline on what to strive for, and what kind of decisions to make

          I'm not able right now to put in words why having those rules in place is important even if the consequences are not there, but I do think that way.
          @HeavenlyPossum

          viq@social.hackerspace.plV This user is from outside of this forum
          viq@social.hackerspace.plV This user is from outside of this forum
          viq@social.hackerspace.pl
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #6

          @SharpCheddarGoblin
          I'm not claiming you said we shouldn't have them, but your argument could also be understood as "there's no point", thus my commentary
          @HeavenlyPossum

          sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • viq@social.hackerspace.plV viq@social.hackerspace.pl

            @SharpCheddarGoblin
            I'm not claiming you said we shouldn't have them, but your argument could also be understood as "there's no point", thus my commentary
            @HeavenlyPossum

            sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #7

            @viq @HeavenlyPossum I'm not *exactly* arguing there's no point. But the fact that we have these laws (aspirational or otherwise), and there are no consequences for certain actors that violate them constantly, makes a mockery of the whole idea.

            Like the tiered legal system in my country, USA. There are no consequences for the Epstein class, and the guidelines are a joke to them.

            viq@social.hackerspace.plV 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH heavenlypossum@kolektiva.social

              I suppose I should be grateful to Trump for fully removing the mask and revealing the entire liberal international order was ALWAYS predicated on the formalization of state violence and state terror.

              andrew773@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
              andrew773@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
              andrew773@mastodon.online
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #8

              @HeavenlyPossum He does domestic terrorism so why not do it abroad? I still think the pager terrorist attack from a few years back is one of the scariest and sickest imaginable especially considering that we make almost none of our electronics domestically.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.socialS sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.social

                @viq @HeavenlyPossum I'm not *exactly* arguing there's no point. But the fact that we have these laws (aspirational or otherwise), and there are no consequences for certain actors that violate them constantly, makes a mockery of the whole idea.

                Like the tiered legal system in my country, USA. There are no consequences for the Epstein class, and the guidelines are a joke to them.

                viq@social.hackerspace.plV This user is from outside of this forum
                viq@social.hackerspace.plV This user is from outside of this forum
                viq@social.hackerspace.pl
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #9

                @SharpCheddarGoblin
                Yeah.
                I think pitchforks have a long and noble tradition in that respect.
                @HeavenlyPossum

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH heavenlypossum@kolektiva.social

                  The US has publicly demanded that Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours or else the US will begin destroying Iranian electricity generation.

                  Under international laws of war, power plants are lawful targets insofar as they power an adversary’s war effort, and harms to civilians must be proportional to the military advantage offered by those attacks.

                  In this case, threatening to destroy national power generation to coerce the Iranian state to alter its policy in the Strait is just terrorism. Not in a mere colloquial sense, but in a specifically legal sense.

                  (So too is the Iranian state’s threat to retaliate in kind.)

                  https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/22/trump-issues-48-hour-hormuz-strait-ultimatum-threatens-iran-power-plants

                  digital_coolie@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  digital_coolie@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  digital_coolie@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #10

                  @HeavenlyPossum
                  "(So too is the Iranian state’s threat to retaliate in kind.)"

                  Not sure about this. What about reciprocity and MAD to thwart agression?

                  heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • digital_coolie@mastodon.socialD digital_coolie@mastodon.social

                    @HeavenlyPossum
                    "(So too is the Iranian state’s threat to retaliate in kind.)"

                    Not sure about this. What about reciprocity and MAD to thwart agression?

                    heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                    heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                    heavenlypossum@kolektiva.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #11

                    @Digital_Coolie

                    Most law does not have a “but they did it first!” clause to sanction war crimes, and that includes international laws of war.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mercurial@todon.nlM mercurial@todon.nl

                      @HeavenlyPossum yes that’s what I’m grateful for as well, but it is extremely uncomfortable, we have to bear it and then do shit about it, at least we have that opportunity

                      pinkmoon@tech.lgbtP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pinkmoon@tech.lgbtP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pinkmoon@tech.lgbt
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #12

                      @Mercurial @HeavenlyPossum

                      It’s terrible what’s happening here. And yet these governments keep lying to us. Two Iraq wars built on lies. The poor citizens, children, and babies are the ones who suffer the most. We live in a very sick world!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH heavenlypossum@kolektiva.social

                        The US has publicly demanded that Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours or else the US will begin destroying Iranian electricity generation.

                        Under international laws of war, power plants are lawful targets insofar as they power an adversary’s war effort, and harms to civilians must be proportional to the military advantage offered by those attacks.

                        In this case, threatening to destroy national power generation to coerce the Iranian state to alter its policy in the Strait is just terrorism. Not in a mere colloquial sense, but in a specifically legal sense.

                        (So too is the Iranian state’s threat to retaliate in kind.)

                        https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/22/trump-issues-48-hour-hormuz-strait-ultimatum-threatens-iran-power-plants

                        leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
                        leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
                        leeloo@c.im
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #13

                        @HeavenlyPossum
                        Exactly like Putinds attacks on Ukraine.

                        You can't support one without the other seeing you on his side.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • heavenlypossum@kolektiva.socialH heavenlypossum@kolektiva.social

                          I suppose I should be grateful to Trump for fully removing the mask and revealing the entire liberal international order was ALWAYS predicated on the formalization of state violence and state terror.

                          rndanger@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rndanger@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rndanger@infosec.exchange
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #14

                          @HeavenlyPossum
                          Just to be real for a sec, "you do not, under any circumstances "gotta hand it to them""

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper