IOC bans helmet worn by Ukrainian athlete, because the helmet contains pictures of Ukrainian athletes killed by Russia.
-
IOC bans helmet worn by Ukrainian athlete, because the helmet contains pictures of Ukrainian athletes killed by Russia.
IOC calls the design "political".
Remembering the people we have lost… "political"… wow!
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/10/sport/heraskevych-ukraine-helmet-olympics-ban
@randahl also IOC: pls do not booh out Vance and ICE: Not political, huh?
-
IOC bans helmet worn by Ukrainian athlete, because the helmet contains pictures of Ukrainian athletes killed by Russia.
IOC calls the design "political".
Remembering the people we have lost… "political"… wow!
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/10/sport/heraskevych-ukraine-helmet-olympics-ban
@randahl I'm torn on this one.
I would have loved for the helmet to be used, but I can see the risk in setting a precedent. I really don't need anyone wearing a helmet with Charlie Kirk on it, and that would probably have to be allowed as well, had they given the green light for this one.
If anything, the entire discussion has brought even more attention to the Ukrainians lost in this damned war, so let's take the win and accept that sometimes you have to limit things, or have to accept that other parties may abuse the hole you made in the wall, for something that you really don't agree with.
-
IOC bans helmet worn by Ukrainian athlete, because the helmet contains pictures of Ukrainian athletes killed by Russia.
IOC calls the design "political".
Remembering the people we have lost… "political"… wow!
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/10/sport/heraskevych-ukraine-helmet-olympics-ban
@randahl
Everything is political.To say ‘no politics’ is actually a strong political statement for the status quo.
Same for neutrality.
-
IOC bans helmet worn by Ukrainian athlete, because the helmet contains pictures of Ukrainian athletes killed by Russia.
IOC calls the design "political".
Remembering the people we have lost… "political"… wow!
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/10/sport/heraskevych-ukraine-helmet-olympics-ban
@randahl
Fk the IOC
They are complicit in murder.
Ukraine now
Los Angeles later -
IOC bans helmet worn by Ukrainian athlete, because the helmet contains pictures of Ukrainian athletes killed by Russia.
IOC calls the design "political".
Remembering the people we have lost… "political"… wow!
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/10/sport/heraskevych-ukraine-helmet-olympics-ban
@randahl ioc is shit. Funny how others just realizing it.
They make taiwan compete as Chinese Taipei. Utter garbage.
IOC is the one playing politics.
-
IOC bans helmet worn by Ukrainian athlete, because the helmet contains pictures of Ukrainian athletes killed by Russia.
IOC calls the design "political".
Remembering the people we have lost… "political"… wow!
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/10/sport/heraskevych-ukraine-helmet-olympics-ban
@randahl And where would it stop? If Russia participates, can they do the same? Or do we only disdain rules meant to guard the neutrality of the games when it involves people we like?
-
@randahl If the IOC was serious about eliminating politics, it would not allow the leaders of the countries to attend - just athletes and trainers and family.
Who are they kidding?
@rhempel I especially like how the producer cut to JD Vance in the opening ceremony, and then immediately cut away, because people started booing, and we cannot have the people's opinion overshadowing the glamorous presence of the VP.
-
@randahl I'm torn on this one.
I would have loved for the helmet to be used, but I can see the risk in setting a precedent. I really don't need anyone wearing a helmet with Charlie Kirk on it, and that would probably have to be allowed as well, had they given the green light for this one.
If anything, the entire discussion has brought even more attention to the Ukrainians lost in this damned war, so let's take the win and accept that sometimes you have to limit things, or have to accept that other parties may abuse the hole you made in the wall, for something that you really don't agree with.
@madsenandersc I think that is a very interesting and nuanced point, Anders.
The challenge is, the IOC is not a democratic organisation, and I find it deeply problematic that they get to decide this on their own. With what mandate might I ask?
-
@randahl
Everything is political.To say ‘no politics’ is actually a strong political statement for the status quo.
Same for neutrality.
@taatm there is a reason Russians have been conditioned to always say, "I am apolitical".
That is what dictators want.
-
@randahl
Fk the IOC
They are complicit in murder.
Ukraine now
Los Angeles later@ChrisHolladay I wonder if the world will even come to LA. Would any team from South America or Africa want to go to a country their fans cannot freely enter and walk around in?
-
@randahl And where would it stop? If Russia participates, can they do the same? Or do we only disdain rules meant to guard the neutrality of the games when it involves people we like?
@wesdym fair point. But Russia was excluded.