RE: https://mastodon.social/@tusk81/115744035236493663
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@tusk81/115744035236493663
Look, the second you concede that They
️ have a right to bring your rights into question at will, you also allow them to set the rules for when to consider the answer satisfactory. This is a feature, not a bug. -
RE: https://mastodon.social/@tusk81/115744035236493663
Look, the second you concede that They
️ have a right to bring your rights into question at will, you also allow them to set the rules for when to consider the answer satisfactory. This is a feature, not a bug. @jwcph
It's reasonable that the executive has possibilities to bring people's status into question. Law enforcement would be quite impossible without.The two problems here are:
1) questions about people's status should be brought to the judiciary ASAP
2) They're not trying to enforce the law. -
@jwcph
It's reasonable that the executive has possibilities to bring people's status into question. Law enforcement would be quite impossible without.The two problems here are:
1) questions about people's status should be brought to the judiciary ASAP
2) They're not trying to enforce the law.@notsoloud It is - but it is not reasonable that citizens be required to establish identity arbitrarily. As a citizen of any nation you live freely within the borders as long as you aren't harming your fellow citizens & in order to accuse you of doing so there has to be probable cause. If the executive can just arbitrarily decide that yes, there is, with no recourse, then there is no freedom in that nation.
