We. Are. Doomed.

[jdebp@mastodonapp.uk]

@HollieK72 @draNgNon

Holy Whys Books, Batman!

I've just found one of them that mentions Olbers' Paradox and actually has the explanation pretty much right for primary school level.

https://amazon.co.uk/BIG-BOOK-100-000-WHYS/dp/B0H2GM3WMJ/

I do not believe that 'Prof. Alex Morgan' is real, though. One of xyr other publications listed seems to be just a riff on the old CIA World Factbook, for starters.

@cstross @lcamtuf
#astronomy #OlbersParadox

[lazarou@mastodon.social]

@cstross as a child way back in the 80s I used to love the books of facts that were published for children back then.
Watching this mindless AI slop be forced on Kids, another part of their childhood's ruined by Late Stage Capitalism, not even the simple joy of Knowledge is allowed us....

[raulmatias@mstdn.social]

@megalodonnelly @drgoon @cstross Because it's a fraud scheme. I'm pretty sure all of this is automated and there is not even a single person involved in publishing this shit to marketplaces and delivering it.

[raulmatias@mstdn.social]

@cstross Can I download a PDF of this? Just for giggles.

[holliek72@mastodonapp.uk]

@cstross @kaito02 100,000 Whys is not a book, it's a book-shaped thing with words and images slopped into it. It has as little to do with actual reading as it does with actual art.

[jdebp@mastodonapp.uk]

@raulmatias @megalodonnelly @drgoon

I just had a similar scout around two Amazons, which have a lot more than B&N lists. The really dumbfounding part is that there are a few actually fairly accurate '100000 Whys' books, sans illustrations, buried in the mix.

But those aren't 'bestsellers'. They're the people with the format, who are being copied by the #AIslop mongers. Even then, though, they appear to be pseudonyms, and regurgitating things like the old CIA World Factbook.

https://mastodonapp.uk/@JdeBP/116788436560592117

@cstross
#astronomy

[holliek72@mastodonapp.uk]

@Ehay2k @cstross I suppose it doesn't claim to answer all 100,000 Whys, just 100 of them - the rest are to be answered by parents, teachers, etc.

[datenwolf@chaos.social]

@internetsdairy @ariels @cstross

Arrows, too. Looking along the axis from the Earth's north to south (which is roughly pointing in the same direction as the normal of the Moon's orbital plane), the Moon moves eastward, i.e. in the counterclock wise direction.

[ehay2k@mastodon.social]

@HollieK72 @cstross

And all of them will ask this question:

Why did we buy this book?

[jam123@mstdn.ca]

@cstross Behold my children, the sloppening is upon us.

[cstross@wandering.shop]

@raulmatias Not without giving the slopmonger money. Which I am morally opposed to doing, on principle (they're thieves, recycling stolen content via an LLM that mangles it in transit).

[mainec@fromm.social]

@Lazarou @cstross and that is after those books were cut down in content already at least in Germany. The fact books I read as a child were a lot more detailed.

[nolsen311@infosec.exchange]

@Lazarou

Can I just jump in here with everyone freaking out about the moon diagram: that's probably the same diagram they've used since the 80s. Yes, there's several things wrong with it. Yes, it drops a 3D structure into 2D.

Does it capture the basics for children who aren't great at visualizing in 3D yet? Absolutely.

C'mon.
Not everything is AI slop.

@cstross @cstross

[glc@mastodon.online]

@Lazarou @cstross

"Giraffes control over 90 pecent of what we see in mirrors. "

Reference: https://store.mcsweeneys.net/products/giraffes-giraffes

[ivor@social.ivor.org]

@cstross christ... what a topic, page after page of slop generated titles...
Noticeable that they're all "copyright all rights reserved" by some person with simply multiple other 100000 books listed, and none have any "illustrations by" credit or anything else.

and I'm pretty sure that's not where the stomach is.

we're fucked.

[renard@equestria.social]

@ivor @cstross Gosh. Any decent librarian would remove that from their shelves.

[mshiltonj@mastodon.online]

@ivor @cstross shit like this is going to hurt amazon in the long run as their reputation tanks, but they'll take your money now.

[root42@chaos.social]

@ivor I'm all eyes and ears.

[bellinghman@wandering.shop]

@renard @ivor @cstross No decent librarian should need to, because no decent librarian would have let it onto them in the first place! But I'll allow that it's possible the titles could have been infiltrated by bad actors of one form or another

[holliek72@mastodonapp.uk]

@Ehay2k @cstross And WTF did we spend £28.23 on it?