@c0dec0dec0de @inthehands @jenniferplusplus I think the problem is actually *engagement* - as well as correct challenge, learning requires active engagement with material (and effort to internalise it). Getting an LLM etc to "help" tends to reward disengagement (as well as potentially allowing you to "reduce the challenge" to the point where you're not actually doing anything hard yourself).
aoanla@hachyderm.io
@aoanla@hachyderm.io
Indlæg
-
We'll see how I feel in the morning, but for now i seem to have convinced myself to actually read that fuckin anthropic paper -
We'll see how I feel in the morning, but for now i seem to have convinced myself to actually read that fuckin anthropic paper@jenniferplusplus it reminds me a bit of the famous thing with the Flat Earth Society people who spent $20k on an expensive laser gyroscope to "prove" that the Earth was not a rotating sphere... and then spent a lot of time being very confused and upset when, of course, it measured precisely what you'd expect from a rotating spherical Earth.
-
We'll see how I feel in the morning, but for now i seem to have convinced myself to actually read that fuckin anthropic paper@jenniferplusplus I like the fact that their own research doesn't fit their lazy claim you reference, and they spend a lot of time trying to work out how the claim can be true, even though their own evidence is against it (and more in line with the mixed evidence in the literature, as you say).