@bright_helpings @tef basically 99.975% of the "it's good for people with disabilities" arguments we've seen have come from white abled people doing, effectively, white-saviorism with a technocratic lens, tbqh

@FritzAdalis well yes, so does slop. the grammar is encoded in the weights of the training, and it might overlap with the real language's grammar close enough to parse, but it's still effectively meaningless outside of the game

it looks and sounds codelike, especially if you aren't a programmer, but it's just similar-sounding "syllables" strung together with a vaguely linguistic rhythm!

LLM-generated "code" is the programming equivalent of Simlish

@toldtheworld @david_chisnall ok, so you have one anecdote of one person getting one use out of it, whereas the rest of the world is drowning in slop.

i don't think this tech has any legitimate uses.

@toldtheworld @david_chisnall the visually-impaired people we've seen around here say that the slop descriptions are worse than nothing. all of this cheerleading about "good for people with disabilities" appears to come from tech weenies doing white-saviorism.

@Openhuman @tante it doesn't. it's all psychological tricks to make you think it works.