Fair enough!
bifouba@kolektiva.social
@bifouba@kolektiva.social
Indlæg
-
Worth looking at both the quoted text here and •especially• the linked page, which is quite good. -
Worth looking at both the quoted text here and •especially• the linked page, which is quite good.I'm as anti-"AI" as they come, but this is a much stronger argument against these systems being intelligent, or about to achieve a breakthrough, than it is against the claim that they are useful. The ability even to quickly retrieve a known right answer needle from a haystack of less useful answers (as opposed to coming up with a new right answer from first principles) would potentially be a valuable service, if it were reliable (and less inefficient, ecologically suicidal, etc.).
-
Researchers just mathematically proved that AI can't recursively self-improve its way to superintelligence.@thearrivingdeparture @devsimsek
Even if that were true, it would still be in contrast to, say, being able to play zillions of chess games against yourself to become a stronger player, which does work.