@rzeta0 @bms @david_chisnall That was probably a reference to the recent incident in which a LLM exploited a bug in the theorem prover to make it accept an invalid proof as valid.
cesarb@mastodon.social
@cesarb@mastodon.social
@rzeta0 @bms @david_chisnall That was probably a reference to the recent incident in which a LLM exploited a bug in the theorem prover to make it accept an invalid proof as valid.