@malte what you or i feel confident about really doesn't matter when you crowdsource making the call, and false accusations are already happening. just pointing to something that seems to need especial care and attention in any useful approach to the kind of functionality you're talking about.

@malte not sure - but it goes to the question of how one proves one's work is one's own and not slop. this problem seems to be happening more and more in education (which is what i had in mind when i brought it up) - i reckon there would be discussions in that area that suggest some answers. eg students being wrongly accused of using AI. i'd love to think i could always tell the difference but it's probably going to get harder over time - unless it all falls in a heap and the data centers all die.

@malte you aren't going to know how many fixated on what. i'm relatively confident given the wikipedia example, but it's still a risk. it would need some kind of appeals process.

@malte i like this idea but i worry about people seeing an em-dash or
a college-level vocabulary will automatically assume it's slop