Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
dangoodin@infosec.exchangeD

dangoodin@infosec.exchange

@dangoodin@infosec.exchange
About
Indlæg
1
Emner
0
Fremhævelser
0
Grupper
0
Følgere
0
Følger
0

Vis Original

Indlæg

Seneste Bedste Controversial

  • More breathless, but vague praise for #Mythos.
    dangoodin@infosec.exchangeD dangoodin@infosec.exchange

    @paco

    I just asked Mozilla about this. Someone responded that internally found bugs like the 271 go into “roll-up” advisories with, each rollup providing a link to the bug list covered.

    The 3 rollups are:

    https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-30/#CVE-2026-6784

    https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-30/#CVE-2026-6785

    https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-30/#CVE-2026-6786

    When you look at these rollups they say that "Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code."

    With no way of knowing how many vulnerabilities were truly severe and exploitable, I think Mozilla, like others gushing ab out LLM-assisted vuln finding, is denying us the data to assess the true value of Mythos.

    Ikke-kategoriseret mythos mozilla claude anthropic
  • Log ind

  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
Graciously hosted by data.coop
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper