AI allows a lazy programmer's reach to far exceed what they are able to grasp.
They can, and do, ask AI to create things they can't figure out how to create themselves, and the end result is therefore incomprehensible to them.
If their new zero day runs without core dumping their code review consists of scheduling a tee time.
Many LLMs were trained by indiscriminately gobbling up GitHub. The end result is that the most probable code for any given problem is likely to be the most common associated coding error, rather than the correct solution.
The primary defect in LLMs is that they are retrospective.
I think of this as degenerative AI.
The K-hole Villionaires who promote them claim they will cure cancer which would only be possible if somebody already cured cancer and the cure had somehow been concealed from us all by the multi-billion dollar cancer treatment industry colluding with shadowy government agencies to suppress the truth on behalf of Space Aliens and yet the document explaining the cure had somehow been published on the Internet by a disgruntled researcher hoping to make a quick buck by selling it to anyone who had $9.95 and no common sense at all and clicked the link below and then the cure was hoovered up by the largest intellectual property theft in history only to be revealed to somebody who wrote the right prompt.
The jobs AI will replace first are the jobs of the people who rely on AI too heavily to do their jobs.
The companies AI will destroy first are the companies who rely on AI too heavily to replace their employees.
The Villionaires AI will bankrupt first are the Villionaires who rely on AI too heavily to prop up the stock price of their rocket companies.
AI is powerful, but so is dynamite.
The fuse is burning down.