E
@downey as a side note, I've noticed GNOME didn't ban AI code submissions either:
GTK+ (seems to encourage AI use): https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#ai-contribution-policy
gnome-shell (doesn't mention and therefore seemingly allow AI use): https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell#contributing
So it might be possible GNOME has a high LLM intake too.
I posted on the LKML: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e12330b9-c29e-45ca-9375-9e3d13426d85@horse64.org/T/
so far no response, though they appear to have seen it (e.g.: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260703115852.GC3659451@killaraus.ideasonboard.com/ )
XFCE discussion: https://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=19293
@jaredwhite is there more exact info on what this list implies? I don't want to add myself if I'm not supposed to.
1. I currently rarely use LLMs when the web search just super fails me, about 1-2 tiimes a month, to locate a tech source.
2. If somebody brought forward LLM-located bugs I would fix them (without using LLMs for the fix, of course).
3. And perhaps I could see myself have a local LLM point out problem spots without letting it make a fix suggestion. Although currently I have no plans for that either, but who knows I suppose.
