@lucydev That sounds like a great place to work at

@rzeta0 In many jurisdictions, yes.

@SteveBellovin This headline sounds like The Onion, but no, it's The New York Times

@dansup @mellifluousbox Fantastic work on the opt-in! Thank you for building this!

Nothing that humans made up is inevitable.

The technologies we use are choices we make. The governments we elect are choices we make. The regulations we design are choices we make.

All of it can be changed, reversed, banned, and is indeed evitable.

#NoAI

@malcircuit @dalias I'm very angry too.

@emilymbender @alex

@aral @ilumium THIS ️

@sharpcheddargoblin That's horrible

@thief_of_fire This a bit vague for a question, but many data protection authorities keep records of reported cases and judgements. I encourage you to consult your regional DPA website to see if you can find any cases relevant to your question.

@feld I am a privacy professional, and your description here is inaccurate. Besides, there are many situations where people are not being paid to be in a meeting, and even when they are, this doesn't magically remove all privacy rights they might have in their jurisdictions. Employees have rights too.

Just so you know, using an AI notetaker during a meeting without priorly asking for consent from all participants before starting it breaches many if not most privacy laws around the world.

In certain cases, it can even breach two-party consent laws, and be a criminal act.

Ideally, never use these privacy-invasive tools ever. But if you do use them, you must ask for everyone's consent first, and respect their choice fully if they refuse to be recorded.

#Privacy #AInotetakers #NoAI