@Roodie This ^ is whataboutism, an attempt to undermine the point being made, a common follow-on in mansplaining which attempts to contest the mansplained expert's legitimacy and authority.
*block*
@Roodie This ^ is whataboutism, an attempt to undermine the point being made, a common follow-on in mansplaining which attempts to contest the mansplained expert's legitimacy and authority.
*block*
@strght @randahl It is the rich and not merely one man because Meta is publicly held. If Meta's shareholders didn't like a product feature and/or level of profitability, that one man would ensure Meta changed to meet shareholders' expectations.
Of course that one man is also one of the largest shareholders of Meta so he shares the same profit motivation.
^^ HakeemG -> irrational agent provocateur attempting to gin up a circular firing squad inside the left...
While doing so from a Nazi bar.
*block*