@schratze but the same can be said about anything basically. Animals, plants, etc
ingalovinde@embracing.space
Indlæg
-
Things everybody needs to hear more often: -
Things everybody needs to hear more often:@schratze @flaubau I don't think majority of names of common popular birds are? Not even in English probably; and in Russian the only other name I can think of is cuckoo. And I have just checked etymology of like 15 birds I could remember and the only one tracked to onomatopoeia is goose (although a couple more come from general words on sounds topic). Names derived from e.g. colors seem to be more popular.
-
Things everybody needs to hear more often: -
Things everybody needs to hear more often: -
Things everybody needs to hear more often:@schratze @flaubau rook is male but it's a completely separate word without any dark associations or connotations. The word is similar to e.g. thrush or woodpecker (both are male too) in shape.
Jackdaw is female but, again, completely separate word, just a regular bird name. The word is similar to e.g. jay (which is also female) in shape. -
Things everybody needs to hear more often:@arichtman @whangdoodler @leguinian_utopia @schratze are you sure I should google it and not search for it on e621?
-
Things everybody needs to hear more often:@schratze @flaubau fun fact is that in Russia, the word for "crow" and "raven" is the same, the only difference is grammatical gender (female for crow, male for raven).
Another fun fact is that the crow in the movie "Crow" (including the movie title) was translated with male grammatical gender (i.e. as "raven").
-
Things everybody needs to hear more often:@whangdoodler @leguinian_utopia @schratze I googled "raven size" and holy mother of jesus what the actual hell
-
I have been watching this story simmer for several days.@futurebird @gotofritz also if a decision to make a strike, and a decision about coordinates of that strike, is made solely on the basis of the information provided by intern or by some python script cobbled together without very stringent quality control, then heads of everybody involved in making a decision to rely on such intern or python script for such purposes should roll. I don't see why it should be different with LLM.
(I'm not saying that wars are good or that conducting strikes on the basis of more reliable information is good. But this specifically is such an obvious violation of all possible norms of conducting wars, it's only possible if those conducting the war don't give even a slightest shit about civilians.)
-
The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.
)