Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
isofruit@mastodon.socialI

isofruit@mastodon.social

@isofruit@mastodon.social
About
Indlæg
3
Emner
0
Fremhævelser
0
Grupper
0
Følgere
0
Følger
0

Vis Original

Indlæg

Seneste Bedste Controversial

  • So You Want To Write An Open Source Discord Replacement
    isofruit@mastodon.socialI isofruit@mastodon.social

    @scunneen @krapp @0xabad1dea
    Have an interest and desire to join a community somewhere for that interest.

    With the discovery functionality such as that from matrix and discord I found:
    - Angular Discord Server
    - React Discord Server
    - Nim Discord Server
    - "Shape of Dreams" Discord Server (Gaming)
    - Nim Matrix channel
    - GTK Matrix channel
    - Accessibility Matrix Channels

    etc.

    These do actually have a fairly valid usecase.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • So You Want To Write An Open Source Discord Replacement
    isofruit@mastodon.socialI isofruit@mastodon.social

    @scunneen @krapp @0xabad1dea As someone that does use discord I'd say private chats make up about ~20-30% of my usage, the rest being VC and group chats. So I'd agree it's not the *main* use-case, just that it's also *a* major usecase.

    Another thing that might get lost would be server discovery.
    A client could still work if "add server" means pasting in a server-URL somewhere, you could even "mitigate" it by hard-coding the major server instances, it just adds a limitation to be aware of.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • So You Want To Write An Open Source Discord Replacement
    isofruit@mastodon.socialI isofruit@mastodon.social

    @scunneen @krapp @0xabad1dea So basically - The servers are fine if they do not communicate, the clients just need to be capable of swapping between server instances? Overall sounds like it could work.

    That *does* open up a weird UX setup though that the DMs between User A and User B are bound to a specific server.
    So suddenly you can have *multiple* DM conversations with the same User as long as you both share multiple servers.

    Ikke-kategoriseret
  • Log ind

  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
Graciously hosted by data.coop
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper