@pelle I could definitely be wrong. It just seems like a lot of the text is not something a person would actually write. For example, why even mention how an old version of the system worked here?
> What a command is worth is the months it took. Four things used to read the last action you typed — whether you had spent the season on people, on somebody who needed looking after, or on each other. That was fair while a year was four blocks and the last one was a quarter of it. With twelve months it meant a life that spent three months on a failing parent and then went to work was judged to have neglected them, and a childhood got a mark or not depending on which action happened to straddle month three. The months are counted now, so a year with three months of SEE in January is a year with three months of it whatever you did in March.
To me this reads a lot like an agent documenting changes, oblivious to the fact that a normal person would have replaced the docs to just cover the current implementation. The same happens in the text explaining the name of the project.
