Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
kaleb@fedi.haugenh.usK

kaleb@fedi.haugenh.us

@kaleb@fedi.haugenh.us
About
Indlæg
1
Emner
0
Fremhævelser
0
Grupper
0
Følgere
0
Følger
0

Vis Original

Indlæg

Seneste Bedste Controversial

  • I know Mastodon hates LLM's and AI.
    kaleb@fedi.haugenh.usK kaleb@fedi.haugenh.us

    @drwhax the thesis here seems to be that a new threat vector – LLM-based bad actors – puts otherwise stable systems at risk.  The recommendation appears to be to employ these same LLMs in an attempt out flank the bad actors.

    While I am not entirely opposed to well reasoned application of LLMs and associated tooling and harnesses to a problem, I question whether a strategy based on matching rather than one-upping the bad actors is a viable one.

    There is certainly value in adapting the security model of many projects, but it’s less clear to me that simply “running an LLM” over a codebase is the answer.

    Ikke-kategoriseret
  • Log ind

  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
Graciously hosted by data.coop
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper