@david_chisnall That's (on of) my concern(s) with LLM submissions too.
It's going to be so much more work to review them than reviewing human submissions, and at the same time the payoff is less valuable. Human submissions, even if they're flawed at first, may result in a new contributor. Reviewing LLM submissions will not grow a new contributor.

@janeishly @downey I don't get it. First the slop machines came for writing, and everyone went “This writing is shit!”.
Then they came for art, and everyone went "This art is shit!”.

Now they're "creating" software, and somehow I'm the crazy one for saying that maybe we shouldn’t.