@david_chisnall admittedly, the above is my reading from Ireland, a “commonwealth” non-jurisprudence jurisdiction, dunno what's the implication for Germany/Portugal/France/countries with sensible law systems not based on precedent

@david_chisnall

```
And that's now an on-the-record statement made under penalty of perjury that can be entered as evidence in any court case against companies selling LLM-integrated tooling.
```

unless this claim is part of the judgement itself, then it's hearsay [except for circumstances which restrict your `in any court case` clause immensely] and can't be referred to

@david_chisnall @mhd

key bit you also referred to before: rendering differences

for decades that was an insurmountable bugbear -- until MS themselves shrugged it away w/ their own incompetence, when it became a complete non-issue

@princesse @Athena

there's a vibe of entryism from their discussion: the pro-AI folks have ensured they get to veto banning AI altogether under the banner of lack of consensus