@lkundrak thanks 
I know I shouldn't care but ape ego makes me a bit upset that my role in these things is just airbrushed from history rather.
But I guess the outcomes matter more than attribution...
@lkundrak thanks 
I know I shouldn't care but ape ego makes me a bit upset that my role in these things is just airbrushed from history rather.
But I guess the outcomes matter more than attribution...
When I first pushed back on randomly putting LLM configs in the kernel, I was excluded from the conversation.
Then when further discussion was had about it, I was excluded from the conversation.
Then when I submitted a proposal to the maintainer's summit about AI, I was rejected and excluded from the conversation there.
And when documentation was submitted to the kernel, my feedback was ignored and I was excluded from that conversation too.
There was literal press about Linus calling me an idiot for it.
When I pushed back on a person lying about using LLMs to generate code, I was attacked and contradicted and forced to concede the discussion.
And recently, in yet another discussion about LLMs in the kernel, I was excluded from that too.
At each point I've had to fight to have my point of view heard.
It feels like many people in the kernel community just want to stick their head in the sand about AI slop.
But it's not magically going away. Ignore me all you want.