we're told the confabulation machines are good at summaries.

which is why acm, not asking the authors, rolled out a summary feature for the published papers, to be displayed along the abstract (because why rely on an existing summary written by the authors of the paper when you can rely on a summary from an autoconfabulator).

it went exactly as well as you think it went.

@agturcz not the point here. (the point is that we can't demand that people don't use the infrastructure that's available to them, and being right doesn't equal being decent humans; telling someone in genuine distress "you should have known better” is a dick move and achieves nothing.)