Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
noisecolor@toot.communityN

noisecolor@toot.community

@noisecolor@toot.community
About
Indlæg
5
Emner
0
Fremhævelser
0
Grupper
0
Følgere
0
Følger
0

Vis Original

Indlæg

Seneste Bedste Controversial

  • "AI" is a failed technology, in the sense that it's neither fit for purpose, nor a likely path to its stated end goal of "AGI", but a lot of people's profits currently depend on pretending it's not.
    noisecolor@toot.communityN noisecolor@toot.community

    @Gargron
    Global warming, pollution, energy issues, all there, on the list of solvable things humanity decided not to solve, long long long before ai.

    But, back to the point: Ai won't go away. Especially now as more and better infrastructure is being built, that will unlock ever better capabilities.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • "AI" is a failed technology, in the sense that it's neither fit for purpose, nor a likely path to its stated end goal of "AGI", but a lot of people's profits currently depend on pretending it's not.
    noisecolor@toot.communityN noisecolor@toot.community

    @Gargron
    I think it's completely disingenuous to blame ai for all the troubles in the world, especially since all these problems were clearly there before ai.

    You have a problem with capitalism, not ai. And I do too, don't get me wrong. I'd love to live in a better, cleaner, juster world.
    But ai has nothing to do with it.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • "AI" is a failed technology, in the sense that it's neither fit for purpose, nor a likely path to its stated end goal of "AGI", but a lot of people's profits currently depend on pretending it's not.
    noisecolor@toot.communityN noisecolor@toot.community

    @Gargron
    Not sure what that has to do with it.

    In the case of ai, the investments are in the trillions, more planned. Infra is growing, businesses are deep in the implementation. Internet search usage is down, ai is growing. The progress is outpacing all expert predictions.

    Again. There is no realistic scenario, that this will somehow blow over or something like that.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • "AI" is a failed technology, in the sense that it's neither fit for purpose, nor a likely path to its stated end goal of "AGI", but a lot of people's profits currently depend on pretending it's not.
    noisecolor@toot.communityN noisecolor@toot.community

    @Gargron
    The world has changed. This is just the awkward beginning. There is no realistic scenario where we go back to 2022.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.
    noisecolor@toot.communityN noisecolor@toot.community

    @futurebird
    I think there is a big divide between what people on Mastodon think people in general think of ai and reality.

    Ikke-kategoriseret
  • Log ind

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
Graciously hosted by data.coop
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper