Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
orionkidder@writing.exchangeO

orionkidder@writing.exchange

@orionkidder@writing.exchange
About
Indlæg
8
Emner
0
Fremhævelser
0
Grupper
0
Følgere
0
Følger
0

Vis Original

Indlæg

Seneste Bedste Controversial

  • I've never been opposed to the word "hallucinating" for describing how AI makes mistakes ... until now.
    orionkidder@writing.exchangeO orionkidder@writing.exchange

    @gotofritz @RnDanger @elfburgerman @AccordionBruce @grammargirl It's a marketing tactic.

    And the problem with the metaphor of hallucination was explained at the top of the thread.

    I'll be blocking you if you keep playing ignorant.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • I've never been opposed to the word "hallucinating" for describing how AI makes mistakes ... until now.
    orionkidder@writing.exchangeO orionkidder@writing.exchange

    @RnDanger @elfburgerman @gotofritz @AccordionBruce @grammargirl Exactly. Making machines seem like magic, seem like they have no internal mechanism, is a common tactic. It's why we refer to external hard drives that we don't own or control as "the cloud."

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • I've never been opposed to the word "hallucinating" for describing how AI makes mistakes ... until now.
    orionkidder@writing.exchangeO orionkidder@writing.exchange

    @elfburgerman @gotofritz @RnDanger @AccordionBruce @grammargirl I think this is true. Like I said above, I have zero expectation that my language use is going to make a damn bit of difference at scale, but in individual conversations, refusing the metaphor of consciousness can help reframe.

    It's just an error. The machine is faulty. It makes errors a lot.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • I've never been opposed to the word "hallucinating" for describing how AI makes mistakes ... until now.
    orionkidder@writing.exchangeO orionkidder@writing.exchange

    @danielmunoz @grammargirl This is why I refer to its "error rate." It's a machine that produces false answers to such a large degree that it shouldn't be trusted. It's simply faulty.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • I've never been opposed to the word "hallucinating" for describing how AI makes mistakes ... until now.
    orionkidder@writing.exchangeO orionkidder@writing.exchange

    @grammargirl To me, that feels like a brute-force workaround, a kludge, not an improvement in the tech itself. It's like saying, my car is too slow, so I'll attach a second engine to the hood.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • I've never been opposed to the word "hallucinating" for describing how AI makes mistakes ... until now.
    orionkidder@writing.exchangeO orionkidder@writing.exchange

    @grammargirl If I understand correctly, it shoves every query through the "AI" multiple times and tests whether it does the thing it's asked to do, but of course, it hides all of that from the user.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • I've never been opposed to the word "hallucinating" for describing how AI makes mistakes ... until now.
    orionkidder@writing.exchangeO orionkidder@writing.exchange

    @grammargirl I'm seeing people claim the error rate is lower with other models, and I'm not sure I believe that since this industries just piles lies on top of lies, but the only plausible explanation of the lowered error rate I've seen is for Claude code.

    Ikke-kategoriseret

  • I've never been opposed to the word "hallucinating" for describing how AI makes mistakes ... until now.
    orionkidder@writing.exchangeO orionkidder@writing.exchange

    @grammargirl This is a good example of why that term is so dangerous. Thank you for posting it.

    That said, while I have zero hope of making that term go away, we also have the word "slop" as a counter.

    "Ugh. It had a hallucination..."

    "Yup. And the results are now slop."

    That said, I don't myself use "hallucination" in the "AI" context. I refer to the error rate, which last I checked, hovered around 40%.

    Ikke-kategoriseret
  • Log ind

  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
Graciously hosted by data.coop
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper