@david_chisnall

Time will tell if it has such an impact; personally, I'm skeptical.

But IMV the case will help to raise awareness how bad AI slop can be, and that AI companies don't give a flying f*** about it.

@pizzapatch

@darth_hideout

@EUCommission

Disinformation like Trump & Putin.

@endolexi

They are even setting up formats in which the US gets a *say* on these matter.

Plus, they declared war on human rights, our democratic rights, health, the climate and environment, plus treasonously collaborating with the fascistic Trump terror syndicate and their donors Thiel et al.

They're lying every bit as brazenly and recklessly as Trump and Putin.

@EUCommission

@jwcph

"Even in an instance where GenAI is technically correct it's still guessing, meaning that it's right for the wrong reasons & the result can't be replicated, a huge science no-no."

@jim

Indeed, it can be a downside.

But it's a lesson from the 1930s, so at least IMV, it's worth keeping.

And Lower-Saxony, for example. purposefully decided against Palantir, and when the latter published their tech fascistic manifesto, Lower-Saxony's official response to the press was something along the lines of "we feel vindicated to have rejected Palantir".

@jim

Many "Bundesländer", however, either use already Palantir, or are about to acquire/use it.

@benroyce @peachfront