@claudius @gabrielesvelto not splitting hairs. Nor am I denying that AI exacerbates the problem - as it similarly increases demand for cycles/energy in many dimensions. Merely considering the issue in broader terms. Why must this be a debate?
Q
qbitzerre@unbound.social
@qbitzerre@unbound.social
Indlæg
-
When talking about the energy consumed by LLMs don't be fooled by arguments focusing solely on the direct power consumption of these models, because they are externalizing a lot of it. -
When talking about the energy consumed by LLMs don't be fooled by arguments focusing solely on the direct power consumption of these models, because they are externalizing a lot of it.@tarmil @gabrielesvelto I speculated about the future.
-
When talking about the energy consumed by LLMs don't be fooled by arguments focusing solely on the direct power consumption of these models, because they are externalizing a lot of it.@Landa @gabrielesvelto I don't doubt it. I've seen these reports too. I wonder if it will persist at the same levels for long, or if it is a gold rush.
-
When talking about the energy consumed by LLMs don't be fooled by arguments focusing solely on the direct power consumption of these models, because they are externalizing a lot of it.@tarmil @gabrielesvelto perhaps. Does the existence of AI incentivize more entities to deploy spidering than in the past? I suppose the premise is that grabbing content is a more compelling prospect if one can employ processing with greater ROI than simply indexing and/or mirroring.
It makes some sense but is hardly assured.
-
When talking about the energy consumed by LLMs don't be fooled by arguments focusing solely on the direct power consumption of these models, because they are externalizing a lot of it.@gabrielesvelto scrapers are not merely a consequence of AI.