@silverpill @bengo "We’re now entering the “extinguish” part of “Embrace, extend, extinguish”

He means that an unspecified large corporate player, who adopted AP at some point, is now moving past the Embrace and Extend phases to literally Extinguish the protocol or the smaller competitors using it.

I'm the first person to support him in banging the drum about this all day long, if he could point me to where this is happening. Alas, insta-block instead of explanation, strongly suggesting BS.

@silverpill @bengo I see spec contributors having a disagreement over compatibility/priority between AP and other specs, but where's the EEE? The OP even outlines 3 different options from his POV to start the discussion on it.

The person who inexplicably blocked me right after I asked for details made vague accusations about EEE going on, and I'm still just trying to find out what they were talking about.

@silverpill @bengo "To maximize interoperability, consumers can accept all three representations."

Same as with the original post, it would be useful to link to actual proposals in the form of an email, or repo comment or pull request. I see only a single contributor for that wiki page, so I still have no idea who proposed what and why it's harmful. But I'd really like to know.

@bengo @socialcg Posting vague accusations without any concrete information and sources is very bad form. Linking to the actual information is literally what the Web was made for.