@luis_in_brief
>local laws/pressure
.is is pretty much bulletproof, not sure about .ph and .gl.
R
raulmatias@mstdn.social
@raulmatias@mstdn.social
Indlæg
-
The best time for a European organization to start building an independent European mirror of Wikipedia, not reliant on the US or WMF, was in December 2016. -
The best time for a European organization to start building an independent European mirror of Wikipedia, not reliant on the US or WMF, was in December 2016.@luis_in_brief Possibly with data being served from different data centers located in different countries for each domain.
-
The best time for a European organization to start building an independent European mirror of Wikipedia, not reliant on the US or WMF, was in December 2016.@luis_in_brief Honestly I wouldn't even oppose mirrors hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation themselves. wikipedia.ph, wikipedia.is, wikipedia.gl, etc.
-
The best time for a European organization to start building an independent European mirror of Wikipedia, not reliant on the US or WMF, was in December 2016.@TheDJ @Profpatsch @luis_in_brief Getting the thumbnails will be a problem, because the last dump of all media files is 13 years old <https://ftpmirror.your.org/pub/wikimedia/images/wikipedia/commons/f/>, but I guess it's possible to just rip them off a "maxi" Kiwix dump. These only have files used in articles, though.
-
The best time for a European organization to start building an independent European mirror of Wikipedia, not reliant on the US or WMF, was in December 2016.@TheDJ @Profpatsch @luis_in_brief A read-only mirror with all pages and all pages' revisions (approximately 5-10 TB, including talk pages, user pages, etc) and thumbnails of all used files hosted locally would be a few hundred TB at most (the entirety of Wikimedia Commons is just ~1 PB <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MediaStatistics>, and that's all files ever uploaded to Wikimedia servers with their original sizes and revision history); not very much.