I didn't mean to imply that it's not serious, merely that it's not new: bigger, yes, but not an entirely new problem to get our heads around.
Humans face the same problems that keep getting more intense until we decide to do something about it.
I didn't mean to imply that it's not serious, merely that it's not new: bigger, yes, but not an entirely new problem to get our heads around.
Humans face the same problems that keep getting more intense until we decide to do something about it.
The Internet has allowed information out where journalists cannot go. It gives a voice to the voiceless. It enables this conversation that would never have happened otherwise.
By it's nature of speed/spread/anonymity, it has enabled us to see the true depravity of humanity — which was always there. You cannot confront what you cannot see.
I reject your likelihood assertion: the right-wing press is pure propaganda.
Banning knives is great, til you have a burst appendix.
Says a man using the Internet to express an opinion to a wider audience than he'd ever have reached on a real soap-box.
Curated news sources have and are also used to spread disinformation: "It must be true, it's in the paper".
Before that it was word-of-mouth. And we burned people at the stake because of lies spread this way.
The medium is not the problem. An education system not worthy of the name is the problem. Truly educated people seek evidence and ask questions.
We used to say, "photographs don't lie."
We used to say, "it must be true, it's in the paper."
We used to say, "he wouldn't be deceitful, he's a gentleman."
AI / deep-fakes are just the next generation of disinformation.
Disinformation: the fifth horseman of the apocalypse.